2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools for Assessment of Communication Skills of Hospital Action Teams: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in a review of teamwork performance measurement tools in obstetrics, Fransen et al 12 evaluated six different frameworks available for simulated settings and noted both limited evidence for their psychometric properties as well as the general lack of a "gold standard" for teamwork performance. This mimics other critical reviews on performance measurements in healthcare 13,14 . We question whether this current approach to teach and 'improve' teamwork addresses the needs of practitioners in dynamic, resource-constrained and goal-conflicted work environments 5 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, in a review of teamwork performance measurement tools in obstetrics, Fransen et al 12 evaluated six different frameworks available for simulated settings and noted both limited evidence for their psychometric properties as well as the general lack of a "gold standard" for teamwork performance. This mimics other critical reviews on performance measurements in healthcare 13,14 . We question whether this current approach to teach and 'improve' teamwork addresses the needs of practitioners in dynamic, resource-constrained and goal-conflicted work environments 5 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In a recent systematic review investigating the "nontechnical" performance of hospital action teams, it was determined that most tools currently in use assess only 4 domains: communication, leadership, teamwork and situational awareness. 13 The several other more specific attributes discovered to be important to highfunctioning trauma teams in this study (role clarity, management, decisiveness, engagement, etc.) are rarely independently assessed in trauma teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, the systematic review found that the current assessment tools for team functioning lack field-testing and evidence of psychometric validity. 13 It is therefore vitally important to assess an adequate breadth of attributes necessary for highfunctioning trauma teams to create assessment tools that truly measure the intended objective accurately. The findings of this study are significant as they define a breadth of attributes identified by trauma practitioners as qualities that are needed to compose an excellent trauma team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication within hospital teams was assessed in various scenarios such as medical emergency team response, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and trauma teams. Only 1% of the searched papers were suitable for inclusion . Commonly assessed domains considered included those utilized in Non‐Operative Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) – leadership, teamwork, communication and situational awareness.…”
Section: Communication Within Healthcare Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review found that validity and reliability were limited and a need for more psychometric analysis, fieldwork and research. Once communication skills are better identified and how correlation with patient outcomes is evaluated, then further facilitation of such skills can be specifically fostered . Such skills include Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (ISBAR), which has become more popular and is increasingly used in Australian jurisdictions…”
Section: Communication Within Healthcare Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%