2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-56365-1.00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tools and Techniques for Characterizing Oil and Gas Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four types of well-log curves were employed to interpret subsurface lithologic characteristics and facies, spontaneous potential (SP), gamma ray (GR), deep resistivity (RLLD) and shallow resistivity (RLLS), of which GR logs provide the best quality information. Variations in well-log characteristics are associated with grain size and bounding surfaces, so different log shapes are considered as proxies for various facies associations, sandbody stacking patterns and depositional environments (Nazeer et al, 2016;Slatt, 2006). In the context of meandering fluvial environments, the amplitude, shape and cut-off style of well-log curves are relevant (See Figure 2 for detail).…”
Section: Well-log Analysis and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four types of well-log curves were employed to interpret subsurface lithologic characteristics and facies, spontaneous potential (SP), gamma ray (GR), deep resistivity (RLLD) and shallow resistivity (RLLS), of which GR logs provide the best quality information. Variations in well-log characteristics are associated with grain size and bounding surfaces, so different log shapes are considered as proxies for various facies associations, sandbody stacking patterns and depositional environments (Nazeer et al, 2016;Slatt, 2006). In the context of meandering fluvial environments, the amplitude, shape and cut-off style of well-log curves are relevant (See Figure 2 for detail).…”
Section: Well-log Analysis and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%