Tool Wear of Aluminum / Chromium / Tungsten/ Silicon-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Wada, Tadahiro

doi:10.7763/ijet.2016.v8.922

Cited by 4 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For this reason, although the absolute value of the flank wear width as shown in Fig. 1 is different, the same tendency as the previous research result [18] is obtained. That is, the wear progress of the Type G tool, which has the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coating film, is slower than that of the Type D, which has the (Al60,Cr25,W15)(C,N)-coating film.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

“…Wada and Hanyu reported that the wear progress of the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coated tool is slower than that of the (Al60,Cr25,W15)(C,N)-coated tool, and the wear progress of the (Al60,Cr25,W15)(C,N)/(Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coate d tool, which is the multi-layer coated tool, is slower than that of the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coated tool in the same cutting conditions. The work material AISI D2 used in this experiment is slightly different in the chemical composition and the hardness from the work material AISI D2 used in the previous experiment [18]. For this reason, although the absolute value of the flank wear width as shown in Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…That is, the wear progress of the Type G tool, which has the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coating film, is slower than that of the Type D, which has the (Al60,Cr25,W15)(C,N)-coating film. Furthermore, the wear progress of the Type D-G, which has the (Al60,Cr25,W15)(C,N)/(Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coatin g film (the multi-layer coating film), is slower than that of the Type G. This indicates that the aluminum/chromium/tungsten/silicon-based-coating film is formed for the aluminum/chromium/tungsten/silicon-target by adding silicon (Si) to the aluminum/chromium/tungsten-target in order to improve the wear resistance of the aluminum/chromium/tungsten-based-coating film [18].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The wear resistance of (Al, Cr, W)(C,N) coated tools with C added to (Al,Cr,W) N coated tools was improved [14]- [17]. Furthermore, the wear resistance of (Al, Cr, W,Si)N coated tools with Si added to (Al, Cr,W) N coated tools was improved [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Tool Wear of (Al,Cr,W)/(Al,Cr,W,Si)-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Wada¹,

Nitta²

2020

IJMMM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, a carbonitride coating film was deposited on a cemented carbide ISO K10 using three different Al-Cr-W-Si targets. The coating film structure consists of mono-layer film and multi-layer films. The hardened steel ASTM D2 was cut with five types of coated cemented carbide tools. The tool wear of the coated tools was experimentally investigated. The following results were obtained: (1) Comparing the wear progress of the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-and (Al58,Cr25,W7,Si10)(C,N)-coated tool, the wear progress of the (Al58,Cr25,W7,Si10)(C,N)-coated tool is slightly slower than that of the (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)(C,N)-coated tool. (2) Comparing the wear progress of the (

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 84%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Tool Wear of (Al,Cr,W)/(Al,Cr,W,Si)-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Wada¹,

Nitta²

2020

IJMMM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The rate of wear of the AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coated tool, which has the multilayer coating system, was slower than that of the single layer AlCrWSiN coated tool in the cutting of hardened steel at a feed rate of 0.2 mm/rev [17]. In addition, the tool wear of the AlCrWN/AlCrWSiNcoated tool, which has the multilayer coating system, was investigated in the cutting of hardened sintered steel.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wear Mechanism of Multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coatings on Cemented Carbide Tools Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Hardened Sintered Steel

Wada

Hanyu²

2019

MATEC Web Conf.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, to clarify the wear mechanism of the multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coated tool in cutting of hardened sintered steel, the rate of wear in the cutting of hardened sintered steel using three types of coated tools was investigated. The Type I tool had a single layer (Al60, Cr25, W15)N coating film, the Type II tool had a single layer (Al53, Cr23, W14, Si10)N coating film and the Type III tool had a multilayer (Al60, Cr25, W15)N/(Al53, Cr23, W14, Si10)N-coating film. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation and electron dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) mapping analysis of the abraded surface of the coating film were performed. The following results were obtained: 1) The wear rate of the Type III tool was the slowest. 2) The area of the worn surface on the rake face “S” and the contact length between the rake face and the chip “D” were measured. Comparing the three types of coated tools, both the “S” and the “D” of Type I tool were the smallest, and those of Type II tool were the largest. 3) The main wear mechanism of Type II and Type III tool showed abrasive wear. However, the main wear mechanism of the Type I tool was both abrasive wear and adhesion wear. 4) The critical scratch load of the Type I tool, 81 N, was lower than that of the Type II or the Type III tool, over 130 N. Therefore, comparing the Type I and Type III tools, due to the wear mechanism of the Type 1 tool being both abrasive wear and adhesion wear, the wear rate of the Type I tool, which has the lower critical scratch load, was slower.

show abstract

Wear Mechanism of Multi-layer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN Coatings on Cemented Carbide Tool Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Sintered Steel

Wada

Hanyu

2019

MATEC Web Conf.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To clarify the effectiveness of multi-layer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coated cemented carbide tools, the wear progress was investigated in cutting sintered steel using three types of coated tool. Tool I had a mono-layer (Al60,Cr25,W15)N-coating film, Tool II had a mono-layer (Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)N-coating film and Tool III had a multi-layer (Al60,Cr25,W15)N/(Al53,Cr23,W14,Si10)N-coating film. The following results were obtained: (1) The main tool failure of the three types of coated tools was flank wear within a maximum value of flank wear width of 0.2 mm. (2) The wear progress of Type III, which was a multi-layer coating system, was the slowest in cutting sintered steel.

show abstract

Tool Wear of Aluminum / Chromium / Tungsten/ Silicon-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Abstract: The above results clarify that the new (Al60, Cr25, W15)(C, N)-coating film, has both high hardness and good adhesive strength, and can be used as a tool material in cutting hardened steel.

Cited by 4 publications

References 8 publications

Tool Wear of (Al,Cr,W)/(Al,Cr,W,Si)-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Tool Wear of (Al,Cr,W)/(Al,Cr,W,Si)-Based-Coated Cemented Carbide Tools in Cutting of Hardened Steel

Wear Mechanism of Multilayer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN-coatings on Cemented Carbide Tools Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Hardened Sintered Steel

Wear Mechanism of Multi-layer AlCrWN/AlCrWSiN Coatings on Cemented Carbide Tool Prepared by Arc Ion Plating in Dry Cutting of Sintered Steel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About