The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-019-1582-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool wear and surface roughness analysis in milling with ceramic tools of Waspaloy: a comparison of machining performance with different cooling methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lopes-da Silva and Hassui [27] studied the effects of tool path along with the process parameters on cutting forces and surface roughness. Yıldırım et al [28] analyzed the effect of cutting parameters and cooling and lubrication conditions on tool wear and surface roughness when milling on the basis of Waspaloy nickel ceramic tools. However, references [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were not concerned with proposing the optimal position of the face mill and the workpiece that provides the minimum surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lopes-da Silva and Hassui [27] studied the effects of tool path along with the process parameters on cutting forces and surface roughness. Yıldırım et al [28] analyzed the effect of cutting parameters and cooling and lubrication conditions on tool wear and surface roughness when milling on the basis of Waspaloy nickel ceramic tools. However, references [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were not concerned with proposing the optimal position of the face mill and the workpiece that provides the minimum surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grzenda and Bustillo [34] examined the possibility of using unlabeled data streams to develop prediction models. However, papers [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] did not describe the optimum position of the face mill and the workpiece that provides the minimum surface roughness either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σf max is the limit of bending strength. By substituting Equations (6)- (9) into Equation (5), the bending stress of the tool is The following formula can be obtained from Figure 18:…”
Section: Critical Conditions To Avoid Low-speed Breakagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing the lubrication method can also increase the tool life. The comprised dry, wet, and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) method was identified as the best cooling method for minimum tool wear and surface roughness [9]. Moreover, the fluid's content used in MQL has an influence on the chip morphology and tool performance [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANN predictions are closer to actual results and thus efficiently predict the machining responses for a proper understanding of the complex cutting phenomena. In the recent investigation, Yıldırım et al [23] observed that the lowest wear among all type of tools is obtained under MQL machining, while the highest level of wear is obtained under wet cooling machining. Finally, MQL attributed the 17.34% and 433.67% better tool wear as compared to dry and wet cooling machining respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%