2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2003.00145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool to classify stool consistency: Content validity and use by persons of diverse cultures

Abstract: Developing and testing the quality of a research instrument, including its ability to be used by culturally diverse persons, is an important methodological objective. The present study determined the content validity and feasibility of culturally diverse persons to use an instrument to classify stool consistency that has been employed in research on fecal incontinence. Five multidisciplinary clinicians experienced in assessing stool consistency determined the tool to possess content validity. Twenty-four forei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the secondary outcome of consistency of incontinent feces, subjects used a 4-level classification ( hard and formed, soft but formed, loose and unformed , and liquid ) shown to have good face and content validity, criterion validity (≥ 80% agreement with experts for 75% of stools tested) and reliability (inter-rater reliability weighted kappa = 0.84 [ p < .001]; Bliss et al, 1999; Bliss et al, 2001; Bliss, Dhamani, Savik, & Kirk, 2003). These ratings were then averaged over each day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the secondary outcome of consistency of incontinent feces, subjects used a 4-level classification ( hard and formed, soft but formed, loose and unformed , and liquid ) shown to have good face and content validity, criterion validity (≥ 80% agreement with experts for 75% of stools tested) and reliability (inter-rater reliability weighted kappa = 0.84 [ p < .001]; Bliss et al, 1999; Bliss et al, 2001; Bliss, Dhamani, Savik, & Kirk, 2003). These ratings were then averaged over each day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool has four categories with depictions and descriptions and can be applied at the bedside, but with fewer categories; it has a good reliability when used by healthcare professionals, nursing students and volunteers 8. Further reliability and validity testing has been performed,8 9 though this instrument has not been as widely used in research. There are no studies that validate the Bristol Stool Chart or the Bliss Stool Classification System in the ICU setting for either clinical or research purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%