2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool-tissue forces in surgery: A systematic review

Abstract: Background Excessive tool-tissue interaction forces often result in tissue damage and intraoperative complications, while insufficient forces prevent the completion of the task. This review sought to explore the tool-tissue interaction forces exerted by instruments during surgery across different specialities, tissues, manoeuvres and experience levels. Materials & methods A PRISMA-guided systematic review was carried out using Embase, Medline and Web of Science database… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(199 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured grasping force was 3.7 ± 1.7 N (average ± standard deviation) out of 15 grasps-releases events, with a minimum and maximum of 2 N and 7.5 N, respectively. These tissue grasping forces are in line with other studies reporting on the surgical grasping parameters [39] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The measured grasping force was 3.7 ± 1.7 N (average ± standard deviation) out of 15 grasps-releases events, with a minimum and maximum of 2 N and 7.5 N, respectively. These tissue grasping forces are in line with other studies reporting on the surgical grasping parameters [39] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other studies of tool and brain tissue interactions showed a range of forces between 0.5-6 N (Aggravi et al, 2016). A review of 13 studies found mean maximum force output from hand tools in neurosurgery to be 1.48 N. Similarly, the review found that three studies reported a mean maximum force output from retraction tasks to be 2.5 N (Golahmadi et al, 2021). The soft retractor should target force output values in a similar range with a maximum of 3 N to generate forces comparable to current retraction procedures and ensure safety.…”
Section: Clinical Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature currently not implemented profoundly in clinical RAMIS systems is the ability to sense interaction forces between instruments and tissue and enable a sense of touch through haptic feedback [77]- [79]. This could be an important development allowing fine-tuned surgical actions for instrument manipulation to adapt to various important vibrations, pressure, or texture that have clinical meaning while operating [80].…”
Section: Fig 4 Concept Of Loa Classification In Ramis Where Current T...mentioning
confidence: 99%