Proceedings Software Engineering Environments
DOI: 10.1109/see.1995.393619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool integration: experiences from the BOOST project

Abstract: The BOOST project aims to support the development of telecommuncations services by establishing effective ways of creating object-oriented Service Creation Environments (SCEs). A major part of the project has entailed the constructing SCEs by integrating existing software tools. This paper evaluates different approaches t o tool integration, covering both antegration by encapsulation within an existing environment, and direct tool-to-tool integration. The use of Tcl, a language to increase tool programmability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decomposition is often used when structuring development efforts or case studies. Discussions often lead to which technical mechanisms (such as explicit message passing vs. message servers, etc., hereon after mentioned only as mechanisms) should be covered ( [4]) or were used to address which integration aspect ( [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]). These discussions often take a "broad" view of what the different aspects entail and discuss only the mechanisms actually used.…”
Section: A Set Of Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decomposition is often used when structuring development efforts or case studies. Discussions often lead to which technical mechanisms (such as explicit message passing vs. message servers, etc., hereon after mentioned only as mechanisms) should be covered ( [4]) or were used to address which integration aspect ( [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]). These discussions often take a "broad" view of what the different aspects entail and discuss only the mechanisms actually used.…”
Section: A Set Of Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluative Baik et al (2002), Brown (1993), Budgen et al (1993), Budgen and Thomson (2003), Chen and Norman (1992), Damm et al (2000), Estublier et al (1992), Estublier and Garcia (2005), Flatscher (2002), Fuggetta (1996), Gautier et al (1995), Grundy et al (1998b), Grundy et al (1998a), Guo et al (2004), Harvey and Marlin (1996), Harvey and Marlin (1997), Jin et al (2002), Kienle (2001), Lundell and Lings (2004), Maguire et al (1999a), Maguire et al (1999b), Mens et al (2002), Michaels (1993), Rader et al (1993), Rover (1994), Sen (2004), Sim (2000), Sim and Koschke (2001), Singh (1993), St-Denis et al (2000), Stoeckle et al (2003), Urwiler et al (1995), Wuyts and Ducasse (2004), Yang et al (1993), Yang (1994), Yang (2000), Yang (2002), Yang and Han (1996), Zelkowitz and Cuthill (1997), Zelkowitz (1996) 40 Papers thelmess (2003). In contrast, Harrison et al (2000) have provided a thorough review of the area, describing the technical challenges that need to b...…”
Section: Descriptive Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several traditional approaches for tool integration: tool-to-framework integration [6], tool-to-tool integration [7], tool integration based on the message server [8]. Tool-to-framework integration adopts an approach that tools can be encapsulated within a single software engineering framework, with all communication taking place by way of the framework.…”
Section: Traditional Approaches For Tool Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%