2020
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/968/1/012023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool-holder working unit used for robot-based incremental sheet forming

Abstract: The diversity of industrial robot applications is constantly growing, and their use in manufacturing processes is increasing year by year. One of the most flexible sheet metal forming process, used mainly for rapid prototyping or small series production, is represented by the single point incremental forming (SPIF). Usually, incremental sheet forming processes are performed by means of CNC milling machines or industrial robots, both having advantages and disadvantages. Due to the superior number of axes, espec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After designing the fastening system, to determine if the technical equipment and optimal parameters used in SPIF are adequate, an important step is to determine the magnitude of the forming forces. Thus, ahead experimental research, a custom-made toolholder working unit was developed [22].…”
Section: Experimental Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After designing the fastening system, to determine if the technical equipment and optimal parameters used in SPIF are adequate, an important step is to determine the magnitude of the forming forces. Thus, ahead experimental research, a custom-made toolholder working unit was developed [22].…”
Section: Experimental Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this paper is to investigate the behaviour of the sheet metal blank deformed through single point incremental forming process, with focus on the sheet metal bending error. Also a mathematical model is proposed in order to evaluate the maximum deviation between the CAD profile of the part and the actual profile obtained through finite element analysis method in relation to the distance between the initial contact of the tool and retaining rings [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Fig 2 Common Defects Of Parts Manufactured Through Spif [6]mentioning
confidence: 99%