2003
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/13/5/327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool geometry study in micromachining

Abstract: With the trend towards miniaturization, micromachining becomes more and more important in fabricating micro parts. Investigations have shown that unpredictable tool life and premature tool failure present a serious concern in micromachining. To further develop the process, a systematic study of various types of tool geometry has been carried out. The tool failure modes and the ways in which tool life can be improved were also studied. Experimental results show that the tool tip rigidity of the semi circle-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason was to broaden the acceptance of the micro milling process because of the low process reliability and the frequent tool failure (Fang et al 2003;Uhlmann and Schauer 2005).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason was to broaden the acceptance of the micro milling process because of the low process reliability and the frequent tool failure (Fang et al 2003;Uhlmann and Schauer 2005).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But Fang et al showed that most geometries with more than one cutting edge are not able to cut properly under micromachining conditions and, with every cutting edge of a USM mill, the torsional shear stress and the possibility of fatigue tool failure rise. This is the reason why most of the USM mills exist as singleedge tools (Fang et al 2003). The most common geometries with these single-edge tools are the micro end mill, the micro-tapered end mill, the micro torus end mill, the micro ball end mill, as well as the micro profile end mill, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cutter Geometry Of Usm Millsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best surface finish achieved by the SFB and SSB has approximately an Rz of 1.8 and 1.0 μm, respectively. In [6], Δ-type and D-type end mills are (Fig. 1f).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that inappropriate design and fabrication will result in the long tool fabrication time and high cost due to the complicated tool fabrication processes, and even worse, it reduces the geometrical accuracy of fabricated tools, subsequently with these tools, it is difficult to achieve acceptable micro machining accuracy and surface quality. Many studies have been performed to fabricate or optimize the geometry of the micro/nano milling tools [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Although some suggestions are given based on the specific tool geometries in the literatures, no guidance criterion has been introduced for the custom micro tool design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it should be the first choice amongst various manufacturing processes. Furthermore, conventional machining processes such as turning, milling and grinding have already been well established [1][2][3][4] . On the other hand, as the feed rate and depth of cut are reduced, special attention must be paid to the cutting edge preparation, otherwise the chip will not be generated owing to the side flow effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%