2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool evaluation for the detection of variably sized indels from next generation whole genome and targeted sequencing data

Abstract: Insertions and deletions (indels) in human genomes are associated with a wide range of phenotypes, including various clinical disorders. High-throughput, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies enable the detection of short genetic variants, such as single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels. However, the variant calling accuracy for indels remains considerably lower than for SNVs. Here we present a comparative study of the performance of variant calling tools for indel calling, evaluated with a wide r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their effect on phenotype was not well studied. Approaches to detect genomics deletion might fail for some deletions based on their length and the amount of supporting evidence [39]. By consequence, current genome-wide deletion detection combines several tools that induce a large effort in terms of installing but also running time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their effect on phenotype was not well studied. Approaches to detect genomics deletion might fail for some deletions based on their length and the amount of supporting evidence [39]. By consequence, current genome-wide deletion detection combines several tools that induce a large effort in terms of installing but also running time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is little correlation between motifs and enhancer activity, these methods could be potentially incorporated to characterize the mechanism of variants identified from snpSTARRseq ( 41 ). Lastly, we did not characterize 36 INDELS as our snpSTARRseq computational pipeline exclusively focused on SNPs due to the ambiguity in INDELs calling ( 92 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emergence of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) technology has enabled the large‐scale identification of personalised genetic characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC). 1 However, the accuracy may be influenced by certain sample factors, such as sampling methods, biospecimen type (fresh vs. formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded) and input DNA amount. 2 , 3 , 4 We creatively performed a contrastive analysis based on homogenous paired real‐world surgical tumour specimens to comprehensively assess the impact of low tumour cell fraction on the authenticity of somatic mutation calling.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%