2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2016.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tool condition monitoring in interrupted cutting with acceleration sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental procedure includes the placement of the accelerometer to the extruder and the overall experimental setup that was used for nozzle condition monitoring using the vibration sensor [46]. The accelerometer installation on Direct and the Bowden extruder are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental procedure includes the placement of the accelerometer to the extruder and the overall experimental setup that was used for nozzle condition monitoring using the vibration sensor [46]. The accelerometer installation on Direct and the Bowden extruder are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While tool wear frequency fluctuates in different stages of wear, AE signal amplitude increases with the increased tool wear and depth of cut. Based on the previous literature [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], it can be concluded that none of the previous studies utilized various sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the signs are able to be utilized for forecasting thoroughly the tool failure achieved. Apart from that, downtime which affected by the failure of the tool could be diminished by monitoring system even though foreseeing it is particularly troublesome in interfered cutting because of greatly changeable stress causing risen tool wear [10]. Therefore, with an efficient monitoring system, it can help to avoid the damage to the machine apparatus, downtime and rejected components [7] [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%