2014
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2014.16080abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too Much of a Good Thing? The Dual Effect of Public Sponsorship on Firm Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studying government subsidy of the French film industry, Jourdan and Kivleniece (2014) similarly concluded the inverse U-shaped effect depending on the stage of a firm. Bradley, Shepherd, and Wiklund (2011) observed that while resource munificence provided buffering capacity and flexibility for experimentation, it depended on having a hostile or stable market environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studying government subsidy of the French film industry, Jourdan and Kivleniece (2014) similarly concluded the inverse U-shaped effect depending on the stage of a firm. Bradley, Shepherd, and Wiklund (2011) observed that while resource munificence provided buffering capacity and flexibility for experimentation, it depended on having a hostile or stable market environment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A good number of past studies have examined the effectiveness of such sponsorship in improving firm performance, using metrics such as firm survival rate, revenue, employment and investment. However, the verdict is somewhat mixed, depending on a variety of contextual factors such as the stage of firms (Jourdan and Kivleniece 2014) and market density (Amezcua et al 2013;Bradley, Shepherd, and Wiklund 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%