2006
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1325:tmoagt]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too Much of a Good Thing: On Stoichiometrically Balanced Diets and Maximal Growth

Abstract: Nutritional imbalances are of great interest in the ecological stoichiometry literature, in which researchers have focused almost exclusively on cases where nutrients are available in low amounts relative to energy (carbon), and animal growth is impaired due to insufficient nutrient intake. Little attention has been given to situations where food elemental content is higher than the level that satisfies animal requirements. However, most animals are strongly homeostatic with respect to the elemental compositio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
229
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(89 reference statements)
17
229
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The aphids were confined by clip cages to their feeding site and therefore had to ingest what was available to them and their reduced performance at the lower rates of fertilisation supports the hypothesis [30] that the phloem sap composition had fallen below a nutritional 'threshold'. In a similar manner, the reduction in fecundity at the highest rate of fertilisation supports the view [60] that an upper TER may also exist for M. dirhodum. Possible underlying physiological mechanisms to explain these effects have been highlighted in a recent review of the literature [44]; they include the influence of fertiliser-induced plant defensive compounds and effects on aphid gut symbionts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aphids were confined by clip cages to their feeding site and therefore had to ingest what was available to them and their reduced performance at the lower rates of fertilisation supports the hypothesis [30] that the phloem sap composition had fallen below a nutritional 'threshold'. In a similar manner, the reduction in fecundity at the highest rate of fertilisation supports the view [60] that an upper TER may also exist for M. dirhodum. Possible underlying physiological mechanisms to explain these effects have been highlighted in a recent review of the literature [44]; they include the influence of fertiliser-induced plant defensive compounds and effects on aphid gut symbionts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Another study with populations of Aphis nerii, begun from apterae placed on milkweed (Asclepisa syriaca) and three rates of nitrogen fertiliser (0, 0.071 and 0.143g NH 4 NO 3 ) [42], found that the highest populations were on plants with the intermediate levels of fertilisation. Here it was suggested the results supported the hypothesis that high levels of applied nitrogen increase plant N concentrations above an aphid threshold elemental ratio (TER) [60] such that performance is impaired, leading to a decrease in aphid population growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…That there are indeed measurable costs to both excesses and deficits of macronutrients is now experimentally verified in several instances ; and see previous section). We suspect that Bertrand's rule is at least as prevalent in nutrition as is hormesis in toxicology (see also Boersma and Elser 2006).…”
Section: Hormesis and Bertrand's Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This large variability in primary production quality for higher trophic levels is caused by a large flexibility in the biochemical composition of algal cells, which depends on growth conditions (Aberle and Malzahn, 2007). The variability of food quality decreases with increasing trophic level (Boersma, 2000;Boersma and Elser, 2006;Boersma et al, in press;Malzahn et al, in press) due to the tendency (or the constraint) of consumers to keep their chemical and thus biochemical body composition relatively constant (Elser et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%