2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Too close for comfort: Attachment insecurity and electronic intrusion in college students’ dating relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
44
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater attachment anxiety has been associated with more frequent perpetration of digital dating abuse, even after controlling for demographic characteristics, such as hours spent using social networking sites and reports of victimisation (Reed et al 2016b). To our knowledge, Reed et al (2015Reed et al ( , 2016b are the only researchers to explore the relationship between attachment anxiety and digital dating abuse. We attempted to replicate the findings of Reed et al (2015).…”
Section: Attachment Theory and Digital Dating Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greater attachment anxiety has been associated with more frequent perpetration of digital dating abuse, even after controlling for demographic characteristics, such as hours spent using social networking sites and reports of victimisation (Reed et al 2016b). To our knowledge, Reed et al (2015Reed et al ( , 2016b are the only researchers to explore the relationship between attachment anxiety and digital dating abuse. We attempted to replicate the findings of Reed et al (2015).…”
Section: Attachment Theory and Digital Dating Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, Reed et al (2015Reed et al ( , 2016b are the only researchers to explore the relationship between attachment anxiety and digital dating abuse. We attempted to replicate the findings of Reed et al (2015).…”
Section: Attachment Theory and Digital Dating Abusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online intrusion has been associated with increased jealousy (Muise, Christofides, & Desmarais, 2009, 2014, decreased trust (Norton & Baptist, 2014;Tokunaga, 2011), and perceived uncertainty in relationships (Stewart, Dainton, & Goodboy, 2014). It may be that technological intrusion is harmful in the beginning phases of relationships, where it is used as a form of surveillance (Gibbs, Ellison, & Lai, 2011;Muise et al, 2009;Reed et al, 2015), whereas in later stages of relationship development, it is used as a form of openness and expression of trust (Norton & Baptist, 2014;Tokunaga, 2011). However, further research on this particular boundary change is necessary in order to more fully understand how CMC is reconfiguring relationships.…”
Section: Structural Influence: Online Intrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship builds on previous studies by finding that electronic intrusion such as spying on a romantic partner's electronic communications without permission, monitoring a partner's whereabouts through social media, and scrutinizing who comprises a partner's network on social media are positively associated with levels of attachment anxiety in college dating relationships (Reed, Tolman, & Safyer, ). These behaviors suggest that social media may increase the risk for college students to regularly engage in the intrusion of partners’ social media as a means to mediate personal attachment anxiety.…”
Section: Campus Social Experience and Cocurricular Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%