1965
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-196503000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and the cleft palate clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single study [17] reported outcomes in terms of hypernasality, which was improved in 3 out of 15 patients and unchanged in the remaining 12 patients. The speech evaluation was performed either: via an informal unspecific qualitative interview with parents and speech therapist [16] or via a non-further-specified speech therapist evaluation for hypernasality and general speech quality [17].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single study [17] reported outcomes in terms of hypernasality, which was improved in 3 out of 15 patients and unchanged in the remaining 12 patients. The speech evaluation was performed either: via an informal unspecific qualitative interview with parents and speech therapist [16] or via a non-further-specified speech therapist evaluation for hypernasality and general speech quality [17].…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author hypothesized that the removal of adenoid improved palatal muscle mobility, thus allowing for this unexpected reduction of hypernasality. The speech evaluation was performed either via an informal unspecific qualitative interview with parents and speech therapist [16] or via a non-further-specified speech therapist evaluation for hypernasality and general speech quality [17]. Finally, no reviewed study performed concurrent tympanostomy prior to or concurrent with adenoidectomy.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two articles were case series [ 16 , 17 ] and one was a retrospective cohort study [ 18 ], all published from the mid-Sixties to the early Seventies. The resulting levels of evidence according to the OCEBM scale were rated 4 for two studies and 3 for the remaining one.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations