Glaucoma - Current Clinical and Research Aspects 2011
DOI: 10.5772/37393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tonometry – Past, Present and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the corneal thickness increases (due to edema) at a higher altitude (3, 13, 38) and thicker corneas reveal an improperly higher IOP reading (39). McNamara (40) and Wang (41) consequently determined that 1 h and longer corneal hypoxia causes an increase in the corneal thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the corneal thickness increases (due to edema) at a higher altitude (3, 13, 38) and thicker corneas reveal an improperly higher IOP reading (39). McNamara (40) and Wang (41) consequently determined that 1 h and longer corneal hypoxia causes an increase in the corneal thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, no statistically significant influence of anterior segment parameters on DCT-assessed IOP has been detected. Moreover, DCT measurements have shown a good concordance with anterior chamber manometry, in contrast to GAT-determined IOP values [1,2,8,26]. Several studies have examined the differences between DCT and GAT according to corneal morphology [7,22,25].…”
Section: Dct Versus Gatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, IOP measurement with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) is significantly influenced by the central corneal thickness (CCT), whereas when using a DCT - and thus avoiding applanation - the CCT would play a lesser role in IOP assessment [1,7]. Other, non-CCT-related factors, such as the IOP level, scleral thickness, ocular elasticity, axial length (AL), and lens status, could influence OPA measurements [7,8,9]. As the characteristics and the pathophysiological variability of OPA remain partially unclear, several researchers are attempting to answer these open questions and find clinically useful applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of this study is to investigate the influence of considering the fluid-structure interaction between the air puff and the cornea on the reliability of methods to estimate the biomechanically-corrected IOP and the corneal material behavior. IOP is interlinked with material stiffness in a complex loop as the measurement of IOP in tonometry is commonly influenced by corneal stiffness, while the tangent modulus (a measure of stiffness) is known to increase with the level of IOP (Kirstein et al, 2011;Eliasy et al, 2019). The challenge to provide estimations of IOP and corneal stiffness that are independent of each other was dealt with in the present study using numerical modeling and employing the results to build algorithms to estimate fIOP and corneal material index fSSI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%