2009
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31819ba5ce
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tongue-Lip Adhesion in the Treatment of Pierre Robin Sequence

Abstract: Tongue-lip adhesion is a good surgical treatment for most children with PRS who have an isolated tongue-base airway obstruction. More invasive procedures such as mandibular distraction can be reserved for patients where a tongue-lip adhesion has not been successful.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial wound dehiscence occurred in three of the 15 tongue-lip adhesion patients; all of the cases were managed nonoperatively by close observation and continuous pulse oximetry. This 20 percent dehiscence rate is similar to that reported in other series 7,27,31,32 ; however, other reports make specific mention of lower dehiscence rates through following specific surgical modifications. 6,9 Three of the patients underwent scar revision of the cutaneous aspect of the lower lip for contractures or unsightly scars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Partial wound dehiscence occurred in three of the 15 tongue-lip adhesion patients; all of the cases were managed nonoperatively by close observation and continuous pulse oximetry. This 20 percent dehiscence rate is similar to that reported in other series 7,27,31,32 ; however, other reports make specific mention of lower dehiscence rates through following specific surgical modifications. 6,9 Three of the patients underwent scar revision of the cutaneous aspect of the lower lip for contractures or unsightly scars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Numerous studies have shown its efficacy in protecting the airway of this vulnerable group of children. 42,43,49,62,63 The detractors of TLA point to the high failure rate and rate of dehiscence. 48,64 The dehiscence rate seems to be mainly caused by technical problems.…”
Section: Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positioning, however, requires constant vigilance, may increase the risk for sudden infant death syndrome, and may make already tenuous feeding more difficult, whereas TLA has historically high dehiscence rates. [8][9][10] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis remains the only currently accepted treatment modality that directly addresses micrognathia in patients with TBAO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%