2016
DOI: 10.1111/lnc3.12182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tone and Phonation in Southeast Asian Languages

Abstract: Southeast Asia is often considered a quintessential Sprachbund where languages from five different language phyla have been converging typologically for millennia. One of the common features shared by many languages of the area is tone: several major national languages of the region have large tone inventories and complex tone contours. In this paper, we suggest a more fine-grained view. We show that in addition to a large number of atonal languages, the tone languages of the region are actually far more diver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires further investigation of the Oeshi phonological-syntactic interface, especially since grammaticalization of tone and phonation is common for Tibeto-Burman languages and has been observed for the related Southern Ngwi language Akha (Hansson 2003). The phonatory alternation may go back to a form of affixation, further supporting that Tibeto-Burman languages are not strict morphologically isolating (Brunelle & Kirby 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This requires further investigation of the Oeshi phonological-syntactic interface, especially since grammaticalization of tone and phonation is common for Tibeto-Burman languages and has been observed for the related Southern Ngwi language Akha (Hansson 2003). The phonatory alternation may go back to a form of affixation, further supporting that Tibeto-Burman languages are not strict morphologically isolating (Brunelle & Kirby 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of the Burmese listeners, the difference between how lexical tones are phonetically realized in their L1 and in Mandarin may have made the cross-linguistic tone perception difficult. As described in the Introduction, Burmese is known to use phonetic features other than F0 substantially, such as phonation type and duration (e.g., Brunelle & Kirby, 2016; Thein Tun, 1982; Watkins, 2001; Wheatley, 2009). Therefore, it is possible that the Burmese listeners in this study were not accustomed to devoting their attention to variations in F0, which may be required for the processing of Mandarin lexical tones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the way in which lexical tones are encoded seems to differ substantially between Burmese and Mandarin; the former employs phonetic properties other than F0, such as phonation type and duration, to a greater extent than the latter (e.g., Brunelle & Kirby, 2016; Thein Tun, 1982; Watkins, 2001; Wheatley, 2009). Some scholars even regard Burmese as a register rather than a tonal language (Bradley, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phonetic situation was undoubtedly more complex.8 Vietnamese tones, as do many languages in Mainland Southeast Asia, have a variety of phonation features, such as glottalization, breathiness, and the like, which played a part in both tonogenesis and registrogenesis (cf. Alves (1995), Brunelle and Kirby (2016)). As for Chinese, Sagart (1986Sagart ( , 1988 posited that Middle Chinese tones had secondary features, including distinctions in length, glottalization, and creakiness, before the height split which doubled the original four tone categories to eight (cf.…”
Section: Tonogenesis In Vieticmentioning
confidence: 99%