2008
DOI: 10.3758/pp.70.5.841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tonal expectations influence pitch perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A brief acoustic event such as a rapidly changing plosive sound can elicit a Mismatch Negativity with a languagecharacteristic left-hemispheric dominance when embedded in a word, but not in a nonspeech context or a pseudoword (Shtyrov et al, 2005). Similarly, in music, listeners' knowledge of the Western tonal system facilitates pitch processing of a tone when it occurs in tonal sequences over atonal, random sequences (Lynch and Eilers, 1992;Brattico et al, 2002) and when fulfilling an important musical function over a less-important musical function in tonal sequences (Marmel et al, 2008). These findings suggest that top-down influences might also affect early processing steps of pitch extraction in congenital amusia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A brief acoustic event such as a rapidly changing plosive sound can elicit a Mismatch Negativity with a languagecharacteristic left-hemispheric dominance when embedded in a word, but not in a nonspeech context or a pseudoword (Shtyrov et al, 2005). Similarly, in music, listeners' knowledge of the Western tonal system facilitates pitch processing of a tone when it occurs in tonal sequences over atonal, random sequences (Lynch and Eilers, 1992;Brattico et al, 2002) and when fulfilling an important musical function over a less-important musical function in tonal sequences (Marmel et al, 2008). These findings suggest that top-down influences might also affect early processing steps of pitch extraction in congenital amusia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical work has been similarly prolific over this time period (Carlsen et al, 1970; Carlsen, 1981, 1982; Jones, 1981, 1982; Bharucha and Stoeckig, 1986, 1987; Boltz, 1989, 1993; Schmuckler, 1989, 1990; Jones, 1990; Bharucha, 1994; Krumhansl, 1995; Schellenberg, 1996, 1997; Tekman and Bharucha, 1998; Tillmann et al, 1998, 2000, 2003; Larson, 2002, 2004; Bigand et al, 2003; Margulis, 2005; Ockelford, 2006; Pearce and Wiggins, 2006, 2012; Marmel et al, 2008, 2010; Marmel and Tillmann, 2009; Thorpe et al, 2011; Ockelford and Sargeant, 2012). This work has also explored multiple aspects of musical expectancy, and has similarly highlighted the factors underlying expectancy formation, along with the impact of expectancy formation for on-going musical processing and subsequent musical memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that top-down processes linked to tonal relatedness (based on listenersʼ knowledge of the tonal system) influence pitch processing at perceptual-as opposed to decisional-levels (see Marmel et al, 2008, for behavioral data with nonmusician participants). In the present study, participantsʼ attention was directed to the pitch dimension with a pitch discrimination task.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The key findings suggest that nonmusician listeners have acquired implicit knowledge of the abstract regularities defining tonal structures by mere exposure to tonal music and that this tonal knowledge drives the formation of expectations for future pitch events. Recent behavioral data suggest that tonal expectations can influence pitch perception even at perceptual processing steps and not only at task-related, decisional processing (Marmel, Tillmann, & Dowling, 2008). Aiming to further understand the processing steps influenced by tonal expectations, our present study investigated the influence of tonal expectations on the neural correlates of pitch processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%