2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma: A report on acute toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of acute side effects showed low therapy related GU and GI toxicity in spite of modest dose escalation up to 76 Gy with 2.17 Gy per fraction and a permitted dose of 76 Gy to the anterior rectal wall. This is in line with other studies on dose escalation using IMRT [2,9,16,36] or hypofractionated treatment of prostate cancer [19,23,26,27,33] and studies combining hypofractionation and dose escalation applying a SIB [5,12,14], although the dose to the anterior rectal wall was limited to lower doses in several of these studies as compared to our protocol, either by excluding the rectal overlap from the boost volume or restricting the allowed doses to the overlap regions at lower dose levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The assessment of acute side effects showed low therapy related GU and GI toxicity in spite of modest dose escalation up to 76 Gy with 2.17 Gy per fraction and a permitted dose of 76 Gy to the anterior rectal wall. This is in line with other studies on dose escalation using IMRT [2,9,16,36] or hypofractionated treatment of prostate cancer [19,23,26,27,33] and studies combining hypofractionation and dose escalation applying a SIB [5,12,14], although the dose to the anterior rectal wall was limited to lower doses in several of these studies as compared to our protocol, either by excluding the rectal overlap from the boost volume or restricting the allowed doses to the overlap regions at lower dose levels.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Slightly higher figures of acute G2 GU toxicity (44%) were also reported by Soete et al (24) in a Phase II multi-institutional study (56 Gy in 16 fractions) with the delivery of a substantially higher daily dose. Keiler et al (23) reported 22% Grade 2 and 4% Grade 3 in patients treated with HTT with standard fractionation. Because a large overlap between bladder/urethra and PTV is always present, a significant portion of the bladder receives the prescribed dose, whereas a good sparing of the bladder concerns the portion outside PTV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(23), in a series of 55 patients undergoing tomotherapy treatment with standard fractionation (79.2-82 8. Gy in 44-46 fractions) reported GI acute toxicities of G1 in 64% and G2 in 25% of treated patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of toxicity (HT vs . similar interventions): 6 CCTs ( n = 642) were included. Acute HT toxicity (G1 (≥ G2)) was 0–25%, which was lower than that of three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT), a linear accelerator (LINAC), traditional IMRT and C‐IGRT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%