2020
DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814717400.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomorrow's Parties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex in the nineteenth century does not necessarily fit the criteria of what we today recognize within the domain of the sexual and may be unrecognizable as such. 131 For Peter Coviello, sex was not yet understood to be a property of the self. It took shape as "a mode of relation, a style of affiliation," rather than as an aspect of individual identity.…”
Section: Sexual Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sex in the nineteenth century does not necessarily fit the criteria of what we today recognize within the domain of the sexual and may be unrecognizable as such. 131 For Peter Coviello, sex was not yet understood to be a property of the self. It took shape as "a mode of relation, a style of affiliation," rather than as an aspect of individual identity.…”
Section: Sexual Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex before sexuality manifested as a proliferating dynamic between bodies, whereas sexual discourse taxonomizes discrete individual qualities, including the gene. 144 By 1915, determinist notions of sexuality, race, and heredity were increasingly prominent, and both sexuality and race were classified as discrete, identifiable, and innate properties of the biological body itself. In chapter 5, I illuminate how W. E. B.…”
Section: Sexual Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%