2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomographic similarity scan with a computed modified absolute mandibular midsagittal plane for precise and objective localization of mandibular asymmetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A semi-automatic technique that involves digital landmarking was employed for cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction in nine studies [23,24,28,31,32,40,[47][48][49], whereas a fully automated and landmark-independent technique for morphometric MSP and symmetry plane construction was reported in seven studies [3,16,21,25,9,33,50]. The fully automated MSP construction method was reported to accurately measure the degree of asymmetry and achieve satisfactory skeletal symmetry, as asserted by the authors in their respective studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Ease Of Clinical Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A semi-automatic technique that involves digital landmarking was employed for cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction in nine studies [23,24,28,31,32,40,[47][48][49], whereas a fully automated and landmark-independent technique for morphometric MSP and symmetry plane construction was reported in seven studies [3,16,21,25,9,33,50]. The fully automated MSP construction method was reported to accurately measure the degree of asymmetry and achieve satisfactory skeletal symmetry, as asserted by the authors in their respective studies (Table 3).…”
Section: Ease Of Clinical Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Between 2005 and 2023, a total of 42 studies were identified, focusing on estimating the mid-sagittal plane in patients with facial asymmetry. Out of the selected 42 studies, eight were computational studies [1,3,[21][22][23][24][25][26]; six were observational [14,15,[27][28][29][30]; 21 studies used retrospective analytical design [4,9,9,12,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]; three were experimental studies [17,48,49], and one study was ambispective in nature [50]. The age range of the patients in all the included studies was 7-57 years.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation