2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3436-8_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomographic Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51,52 APT data were reconstructed using a standard shank angle reconstruction algorithm. 53,54 CL measurements were carried out using an Attolight CL-dedicated SEM microscope. The acceleration voltage was 5 kV, and the beam current was ≈3 nA.…”
Section: Methods/experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…51,52 APT data were reconstructed using a standard shank angle reconstruction algorithm. 53,54 CL measurements were carried out using an Attolight CL-dedicated SEM microscope. The acceleration voltage was 5 kV, and the beam current was ≈3 nA.…”
Section: Methods/experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The APT experiment was performed at low electric field conditions on the tip surface, as suggested by the charge-state-ratio Ga 2+ /Ga + ∼ 0.03, corresponding to a surface field of 230 MV/cm . This allows us to observe the best signal-to-noise ratio in the mass spectrum , and reduce the preferential loss of metallic species during tip evaporation. , APT data were reconstructed using a standard shank angle reconstruction algorithm. , …”
Section: Methods/experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%