1995
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(95)00076-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tomographic imaging of lithospheric structures under Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
219
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
17
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the six stations investigated, the resulting simplified models provide an average estimate of 38 km for the Moho thickness surrounding the Central Range of Taiwan. Also, the individual station estimates compare well with the recent tomographic model of RAU and WU (1995) and the refraction results of MA and SONG (1997). …”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…For the six stations investigated, the resulting simplified models provide an average estimate of 38 km for the Moho thickness surrounding the Central Range of Taiwan. Also, the individual station estimates compare well with the recent tomographic model of RAU and WU (1995) and the refraction results of MA and SONG (1997). …”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The other seis mic ob ser va tion (B-B') along the west ern coast of Tai wan is ob tained from tomographic in ver sion by jointly us ing the seis mic data set of the CWBSN and two tem po rary seis mic ar rays in Hualien and Pingtung (Kim et al 2005). We as sume that the Vp = 7.5 km s -1 , taken as the av er age ve loc ity of three seis mic tomography re sults (Rau and Wu 1995;Ma et al 1996;Wu et al 2007), is the dis con tin ued in ter face be tween the lower crust and up per man tle. The depth of in ter face es ti mated from the ve loc ity struc tures range from 32 to 34 km (Fig.…”
Section: Moho Depth and Discussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 500 M L ≥ 3.0 earthquakes recorded by the CWBSN from 1991 to 2010 were selected for northwestern Taiwan. These earthquakes were relocated using a previously published 3D velocity model (Rau and Wu 1995) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Earthquake Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%