2005
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.21.1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toluene/ter-Butanol Mixed Solvent for the Selective Extraction of Cr(VI) from Divalent Heavy Metals

Abstract: A solvent-extraction system comprising toluene/ter-butanol (ter-BuOH) mixed solvent as the organic phase was developed to selectively extract Cr(VI) from acidic chloride media in the presence of divalent metals, namely Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) under 5 M CaCl2 salting-out conditions. Chromium(VI) was selectively extracted as a solvated ion-pair of [ter-BuOH2+ x CrO3Cl-] at ter-BuOH mole fractions of between 0.1 and 0.6 (9.0-57.2% in volume). Divalent metals were extracted at ter-BuOH mole fract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 For visually determining trace constituents in environmental water samples, it is 54 necessary to concentrate the sample to a level at which determination is possible. The 55 measurement of heavy metals in water samples requires the use of preconcentration methods, 56 such as coprecipitation, ion exchange, and extraction [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. 57 In this study, cloud point extraction (CPE) using a nonionic surfactant [16][17][18] was 58 selected as the preconcentration method for enabling the visual determination of Cu(II).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 For visually determining trace constituents in environmental water samples, it is 54 necessary to concentrate the sample to a level at which determination is possible. The 55 measurement of heavy metals in water samples requires the use of preconcentration methods, 56 such as coprecipitation, ion exchange, and extraction [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. 57 In this study, cloud point extraction (CPE) using a nonionic surfactant [16][17][18] was 58 selected as the preconcentration method for enabling the visual determination of Cu(II).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it can be found that the salting effect of ionic liquids is less effective for improving the extraction performance than inorganic solid salt. This may be attributed to the large monovalent ions causing poor salting-out effect . Although the separation ability of ionic liquids is weaker than that of inorganic solid salts, they are in the liquid state at room temperature and thus have no problems of dissolution, tub-jam, and transport brought on by inorganic solid salts in industry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the large monovalent ions causing poor salting-out effect. 38 Although the separation ability of ionic liquids is weaker than that of inorganic solid salts, they are in the liquid state at room temperature and thus have no problems of dissolution, tub-jam, and transport brought on by inorganic solid salts in industry. Therefore, ionic liquids are regarded as green separating agents and suitable for application at industrial scale for intensifying the conventional separation processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clay minerals, gelatin, biosorbent, and active carbon, synthetic polymers, C18-bonded silica, silica gel immobilized with Zr(IV) and Zr(VI) phosphate have been used for preconcentration and/or separation of trace and ultra trace amounts of toxic metal ions from complex matrices. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Determination and chemical speciation of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) at trace levels in welding fumes and in drinking water samples using strong anion ion-exchange, 16 neutral alumina, 17 mini-columns packed with resin immobilized with 8-hydroxyquinoline, 18 activated carbon, 19 leaching procedure with sodium carbonate 5 and drawn and modified lingo cellulosic materials 20,21 have been reported. However, some of these SPE methods [10][11][12][13][14][15] are too expensive or unselective; they require careful experimental conditions, are time consuming and are not compatible with the detection limit of Cr(VI) in various matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%