2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782011000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerance to water deficiency between two soybean cultivars: transgenic versus conventional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the apparent quantum efficiency, the light compensation point was increased in the plants maintained under drought stress, with emphasis on the non-irrigated control, which obtained a higher value, exceeding in 391.07 % the irrigated control. Corroborating the present results, the literature has demonstrated that soybean plants under drought stress present an increase in the light compensation point (Catuchi et al 2011). Larcher (2003 reports that the increase in the light compensation point indicates that the plant respiration overcame the drought stress conditions, what will result in a decrease of the plant production ( Figure 3) for the non-irrigated control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly to the apparent quantum efficiency, the light compensation point was increased in the plants maintained under drought stress, with emphasis on the non-irrigated control, which obtained a higher value, exceeding in 391.07 % the irrigated control. Corroborating the present results, the literature has demonstrated that soybean plants under drought stress present an increase in the light compensation point (Catuchi et al 2011). Larcher (2003 reports that the increase in the light compensation point indicates that the plant respiration overcame the drought stress conditions, what will result in a decrease of the plant production ( Figure 3) for the non-irrigated control.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A deficiência hídrica foi estabelecida durante um período de 25 dias, entre os estádios de desenvolvimento R1 (início do florescimento) e R5 (início do enchimento das sementes), com controle da irrigação realizado pelo método gravimétrico (Catuchi et al, 2011). Além do controle da reposição da irrigação, os níveis de umidade do solo foram monitorados por sensor de umidade e temperatura do solo, modelo EC-5 (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, EUA), acoplado a um leitor digital, modelo ECH 2 O Check.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…After 15 days of plant emergence, different water conditions were induced and pots were kept at 100% (control) or 30% of the evapotranspirated water (water stress). The daily control of evapotranspiration was carried out using the gravimetric method (Catuchi et al 2011). Soil moisture contents were monitored by humidity and temperature sensors (Prochek®; Decagon Devices, Pulman, WA, USA).…”
Section: Plant Materials and Growth Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%