2016
DOI: 10.1177/1091581815622442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tolerable Levels of Nonclinical Vehicles and Formulations Used in Studies by Multiple Routes in Multiple Species With Notes on Methods to Improve Utility

Abstract: Formulation of nonclinical evaluations is a challenge, with the fundamental need to achieve multiples of the clinical exposure complicated by differences in species and routes of administration-specific tolerances, depending on concentrations, volumes, dosing regimen, duration of each administration, and study duration. Current practice to approach these differences is based on individual experience and scattered literature with no comprehensive data source (the most notable exception being our 2006 publicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vehicle for abemaciclib and ribociclib was 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 0.25% tween 80 in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer, pH 3; and the vehicle for palbociclib was 0.5% methylcellulose. These vehicles are considered well tolerated by the GI tract based on concurrent vehicle results, our previous use of these and similar vehicles, and on reported literature (21,22); therefore, we used only one vehicle as control. Plasma exposure was measured in samples obtained on Day 10 at 1, 4, 7, and 24 hours after dosing.…”
Section: Toxicity Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vehicle for abemaciclib and ribociclib was 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, 0.25% tween 80 in 10 mmol/L citrate buffer, pH 3; and the vehicle for palbociclib was 0.5% methylcellulose. These vehicles are considered well tolerated by the GI tract based on concurrent vehicle results, our previous use of these and similar vehicles, and on reported literature (21,22); therefore, we used only one vehicle as control. Plasma exposure was measured in samples obtained on Day 10 at 1, 4, 7, and 24 hours after dosing.…”
Section: Toxicity Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were dosed orally with MET.HCL formulated in 1% hydroxyethylcellulose (w/v), 0.25% polysorbate 80 (v/v), 0.05% antifoam (v/v), purified water q.s. at a dose of 5 mg/kg in a 5 ml/kg dose volume [21]. After a 7-day washout period, the animals were intravenously administered 0.5 mg/kg of MET.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Intravenous and Oral Metformin And Rs-verapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a 7-day washout period, the animals were intravenously administered 0.5 mg/kg of MET. HCL or R,S-VER formulated in 25 mM NaPO 4 buffer, pH6 [21]. Blood samples were collected in K 2 EDTA tubes prior to dosing and at selected time points up to 48 h after dose administration.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics Of Intravenous and Oral Metformin And Rs-verapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sodium lauryl sulfate, also referred to as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), is an anionic surfactant used in cosmetics, other consumer products, laboratory applications, and pharmaceutical formulations. [4][5][6] The chemical properties of surfactants such as SLS aid the dissolution of substances in pharmaceutical formulations. 7 Sodium lauryl sulfate is an irritant to various tissues, including the respiratory mucosa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The oral toxicity and tolerability of SLS, with or without other excipients, have been evaluated in dogs and rats via gavage, feed, or water. 4,8,9 However, limited information exists regarding the oral tolerability or toxicity in mice when administered by gavage. Dogs and rats tolerate daily oral dosing of formulations containing 0.5% SLS for at least 26 weeks by gavage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%