Abstract:In this article, we argue that interprofessional competencies are increasingly necessary to achieving success in all facets of a professional psychologist's work. We note that the growing complexity of health challenges facing Canadians requires a renewed investment in interprofessional care and interdisciplinary research. We define key terms and discuss significant national and international trends toward interprofessional, competency-based training in health professional education. In Canada, psychology has … Show more
“…Rather, psychology learners are historically educated within siloed academic departments, private clinics, and specialty care settings, with only a minority gaining experience within multidisciplinary clinics or medical settings. This is in opposition to current recognition of the importance of IPE in training for psychology learners [21,22], as well as the notable bene ts psychology presence can offer to other disciplines (e.g., improved familiarity, con dence, effectiveness, and e ciency in medical residents' interactions with patients with mental health concerns) [23][24][25][26]. Fortunately, language aligned with IPE has recently been incorporated as standard practice for clinical psychology learners in the United States [27], placing a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary training for all psychology learners and aligning the profession more closely with others in the healthcare eld.…”
Daily clinical practice of mental health professionals often requires interaction between providers from diverse training and professional backgrounds. Efforts to engage mental health trainees across disciplines are necessary and have had varied outcomes. The current study reviews the development and implementation of a monthly one-hour integrated case presentation seminar (ICPS) as part of independent psychology and psychiatry two-year fellowships at a Midwestern teaching hospital. The training integrated a semi-structured seminar to facilitate case presentation within a group setting. The focus of the seminar was to allow for exposure to conceptualization, diagnostic, and treatment strategies and skills, as well as science-based practice techniques for trainees. Learner survey results and the sustained offering of the seminar suggest the format and goals of the seminar are feasible and acceptable. Based on the current preliminary findings, similar training programs may find benefit in strategies to enhance integrated training opportunities for psychiatry and psychology trainees.
“…Rather, psychology learners are historically educated within siloed academic departments, private clinics, and specialty care settings, with only a minority gaining experience within multidisciplinary clinics or medical settings. This is in opposition to current recognition of the importance of IPE in training for psychology learners [21,22], as well as the notable bene ts psychology presence can offer to other disciplines (e.g., improved familiarity, con dence, effectiveness, and e ciency in medical residents' interactions with patients with mental health concerns) [23][24][25][26]. Fortunately, language aligned with IPE has recently been incorporated as standard practice for clinical psychology learners in the United States [27], placing a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary training for all psychology learners and aligning the profession more closely with others in the healthcare eld.…”
Daily clinical practice of mental health professionals often requires interaction between providers from diverse training and professional backgrounds. Efforts to engage mental health trainees across disciplines are necessary and have had varied outcomes. The current study reviews the development and implementation of a monthly one-hour integrated case presentation seminar (ICPS) as part of independent psychology and psychiatry two-year fellowships at a Midwestern teaching hospital. The training integrated a semi-structured seminar to facilitate case presentation within a group setting. The focus of the seminar was to allow for exposure to conceptualization, diagnostic, and treatment strategies and skills, as well as science-based practice techniques for trainees. Learner survey results and the sustained offering of the seminar suggest the format and goals of the seminar are feasible and acceptable. Based on the current preliminary findings, similar training programs may find benefit in strategies to enhance integrated training opportunities for psychiatry and psychology trainees.
“…Rather, psychology learners are historically educated within siloed academic departments, private clinics, and specialty care settings, with only a minority gaining experience within multidisciplinary clinics or medical settings. This is in opposition to current recognition of the importance of IPE in training for psychology learners [ 21 , 22 ], as well as the notable benefits psychology’s presence can offer to other disciplines (e.g., improved familiarity, confidence, effectiveness, and efficiency in medical residents’ interactions with patients with mental health concerns) [ 23 – 26 ]. Fortunately, language aligned with IPE has recently been incorporated as standard practice for clinical psychology learners in the United States [ 27 ], placing a greater emphasis on interdisciplinary training for all psychology learners and aligning the profession more closely with others in the healthcare field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Holmqvist, Button, and Heath [ 32 ] demonstrated how participation in highly structured IPE programming with various medical and behavioral health learners can improve clinical psychology trainees’ beliefs about the importance of collaborative practice, as well as their own collaborative skills. Encouraging psychology and nursing learners to collaborate demonstrated similar positive results [ 33 ].…”
Daily clinical practice of mental health professionals often requires interaction between providers from diverse training and professional backgrounds. Efforts to engage mental health trainees across disciplines are necessary and have had varied outcomes. The current study reviews the development and implementation of a monthly one-hour integrated case presentation seminar (ICPS) as part of independent psychology and psychiatry two-year fellowships at a Midwestern teaching hospital. The training integrated a semi-structured seminar to facilitate case presentation within a group setting. The focus of the seminar was to allow for exposure to conceptualization, diagnostic, and treatment strategies and skills, as well as science-based practice techniques for trainees. Learner survey results and the sustained offering of the seminar suggest the format and goals of the seminar are feasible and acceptable. Based on the current preliminary findings, similar training programs may find benefit in strategies to enhance integrated training opportunities for psychiatry and psychology trainees.
“…If one has the view that other health professions are not as well trained or educated as is psychology, then one would view collaborative interprofessional education initiatives with these other professions as having lesser value. Until we are able to recognize the value and worth of what our colleagues in other professions provide, then psychology will not have the skills necessary for evidence-based, coordinated care (Holmqvist et al, 2019).…”
Models of training for professional psychologists in Canada have developed in uneven stages over the last 75 years. Our first national conference on models of training occurred more than a decade after the seminal U.S. meeting in Boulder, Colorado. In the 20th century, our only national conference with a primary focus on training was at Lake Couchiching, Ontario, in 1965. There have been national conferences where some of the proceedings focused on training, but most of the developments in our training models have resulted from developments in our accreditation standards and recommendations from the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA) Task Forces. It was not until the 2019 National Summit on the Future of Professional Psychology Training that the profession held another national conference with a specific focus on the future of professional psychology training in Canada. However, as with other national conferences, the challenge for our profession will be in the implementation of these recommendations. There are substantive barriers to their implementation, particularly for our training programs. Strategies suggested by Paul Meehl in 1964 for challenging the academic status quo to move forward with significant changes in training are reviewed with reference to the implementation of the National Summit recommendations. If psychology in Canada is to develop its models for professional training for the 21st century, then these types of challenges are necessary to force needed changes to occur.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.