Toffoli Netlist and QCA implementations for existing four variable reversible gates: a comparative analysis

Sultana, Mahamuda; Chaudhuri, Ayan; Sengupta, Diganta; Chaudhuri, Atal

doi:10.1007/s00542-018-4065-1

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Authors of [19] have proposed design for 4:16 decoder using Toffoli, Feynman and Peres Gate. It can be observed in [12] that the three mentioned gates are enhanced versions of Toffoli gates. Since, the designs have been realized used Toffoli Gates only, hence the authors have selected Fig.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reversible computing has presented two domains of implementations; one using reversible gates and the other using Quantum Dot Cellular Automata (QCA) cells [3] [9] has been used to design the high level schematic for the error signal generator, as discussed later. Multiple four variable reversible gates have been proposed till date [10] [11] [12] with varied realizations. Apart from reversible gate proposals, circuit optimization [13] and online testability [14] of reversible circuits have been two major research thrust areas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Hamming Code Converter using Reversible Toffoli Netlist

Sengupta*¹,

Sultana²,

Chaudhuri³

2019

IJRTE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological advancements in the last two decades have witnessed a plethora of emerging technologies gaining global research attention. One of them is reversible logic due to its capability to arrest tremendous amount of heat generated in modern digital conversions at the architecture level. With CMOS reaching near capping of threshold parameters, researchers are imperatively exploring the reversible domain for possible alternatives. Telecommunication is one area which expects appreciable share of digital resources. This communication proposes the reversible version of Hamming Code converter, decoder, and Corrector unit. Hamming codes form one of the perfect codes attaining the Hamming Bound. The designs have been implemented using Toffoli Netlist. A state-of-the-art four variable reversible gate in literature has been used to design the high level schematic for part of the proposals. The authors provide the results in terms of primitive Quantum Metrics.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hamming Code Converter using Reversible Toffoli Netlist

Sengupta*¹,

Sultana²,

Chaudhuri³

2019

IJRTE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Ludovico Minati . makes quantum technology a promising technology for future computer systems [7], [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quaternary Reversible Circuit Optimization for Scalable Multiplexer and Demultiplexer

Monfared

Ciriani

Mikkonen³

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Information loss is generally related to power consumption. Therefore, reducing information loss is an interesting challenge in designing digital systems. Quaternary reversible circuits have received significant attention due to their low-power design applications and attractive advantages over binary reversible logic. Multiplexer and demultiplexer circuits are crucial parts of computing circuits in ALU, and their efficient design can significantly affect the processors' performance. A new scalable realization of quaternary reversible 4 × 1 multiplexer and 1 × 4 demultiplexer, based on quaternary 1-qudit Shift, 3-qudit Controlled Feynman, and 2-qudit Muthukrishnan-Stroud gates, is presented in this paper. Moreover, the corresponding generalized quaternary reversible n×1 multiplexer and 1×n demultiplexer circuits are proposed. The comparison, with respect to the current literature, shows that the proposed circuits are more efficient in terms of quantum cost, the number of garbage outputs, and the number of constant inputs.

show abstract