Today's doctors: What do men and women value in a training post?

Abstract

Objectives: Recent studies suggest that traditional male-female differences may be changing in terms of what is valued in a medical career but there have been no studies directly quantifying the relationship between gender and stated career-related preferences. To address this gap, we examined the differences between male and female doctors in terms of the strength of their work-related preferences at the point of eligibility to enter residency or specialty training in the UK. Methods:This was a quantitative study using a survey incorporating a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Respondents were asked a series of questions in which they had to choose between two or more scenarios, differing in terms of attributes. The attributes were: location; familiarity with specialty; culture of the working and learning environment; earnings; working conditions, and opportunities for professional development. The main outcome measure was willingness to accept compensation to forgo a desirable attribute within a training position. Conditional logistic regression models were run separately for males and females. Results:A total of 5005 out of 6890 (73%) Foundation Year 2 doctors completed the DCE. The relative value of each attribute was similar for males and females, with location most valued and familiarity with the specialty least valued. There was a pattern of female respondents valuing the move between the best and worst levels of each training attribute more than men, and significantly more than men in respect of the importance of working culture. Conclusions:This study adds to existing knowledge in terms of quantifying gendered values in respect of training or residency preferences. That men value a supportive working culture significantly less than women is well established. However, our findings that location, working conditions and working culture are increasingly important to both men and women, suggests that traditional gender norms may be changing.This intelligence can inform gender-responsive workforce planning and innovation, and future research. | 409 SCANLAN et AL.

What do Iranian physicians value most when choosing a specialty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment

“…As several studies have shown that factors such as income, prestige, and procedural activities are more important to male physicians, results of this study may indicate that the pattern of choosing a specialty among women is changing. These findings are consistent with a study by Scanlan et al which showed that gender norms of career selection are changing [ 66 ]. National policies could be developed to address undesirable gender trends in the selection of specialty courses.…”

A national survey on the characteristics of iranian general practitioners and their preferred specialty: A need to transition toward preventive medicine

“…among foundation doctors in the UK suggested that the traditional gender gap in specialty selection may be narrowing. [ 44 ] Furthermore, Baschera women et al . discussed that gender might not be a significant determinant of preference for non-surgical specialties.…”

Career aspirations among specialty residents in France: a cross-sectional gender-based comparison

“…These were the lack of mentor and female models which would make it possible to create vocations, difficulties in time management linked to clinical, research, and teaching activities together, which characterizes the French university hospital model, and a lower interest in research on women's part. As Scanlan et al pointed out, many studies have been done on a single specialty or on small numbers of students, but few on a group of students from several specialties [9].…”