2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2023.113637
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco heating system has less impact on bone metabolism than cigarette smoke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several toxic components in tobacco smoke were the same as those in particulates. Nicotine and other toxic components in tobacco smoke can promote osteoclast differentiation, which was the superimposed harmful factor of COFs ( 44 ). Similarly, total LS BMD declines in drinkers were more severe than in non-drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several toxic components in tobacco smoke were the same as those in particulates. Nicotine and other toxic components in tobacco smoke can promote osteoclast differentiation, which was the superimposed harmful factor of COFs ( 44 ). Similarly, total LS BMD declines in drinkers were more severe than in non-drinkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retear rates of the propensity score-matched cigarette smoker and heated tobacco smoker groups were not significantly different, but the odds ratio (OR) for retearing was slightly lower in the heated tobacco smoker group than in the cigarette smoker group according to the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Several independent investigations have shown that heated tobacco products are less hazardous to musculoskeletal tissue than conventional cigarettes 45,46 . Aspera-Werz et al 45 showed that heated tobacco product use had significantly less harmful effects on osteoblast differentiation than conventional cigarette smoking, implying a reduced burden of oxidative stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the articles identified that described in vitro toxicological analyses of HTPs, articles were excluded from detailed discussion in this section of the review if they did not detail a direct quantitative comparison between the HTP(s) under investigation and other nicotine-or tobacco-containing products such as cigarettes and/or EVPs (i.e., statistical analyses were reported solely between the effects of the HTP and the negative control used) [64,65]; investigated any cell line not related to tissues of the oral cavity, respiratory tract, cardiovascular system or pluripotent stem cells [66][67][68][69][70][71][72]; attempted to investigate different human exposure scenarios using the same experimental methodology (i.e., sidestream smoke released by cigarettes being compared to aerosol produced by an HTP as a means of comparing bystander exposure between products) [67].…”
Section: In Vitro Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%