2012
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.40.8815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco Assessment in Actively Accruing National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group Program Clinical Trials

Abstract: Most actively accruing cooperative group clinical trials do not assess tobacco use, and there is no observable trend in improvement over the past 8 years. Failure to incorporate standardized tobacco assessments into NCI-funded Cooperative Group Clinical Trials will limit the ability to provide evidence-based cessation support and will limit the ability to accurately understand the precise effect of tobacco use on cancer treatment outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A shortcoming of P-1, typical of trials in cancer prevention and treatment, is that follow-up tobacco use data were not collected. The increasing evidence of the clinical impact of tobacco use on cancer prevention and prognosis across a range of disease sites warrants more widespread assessment in clinical trials than has typically been conducted (10, 29, 4447). Biochemical validation of smoking status was not conducted in P-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shortcoming of P-1, typical of trials in cancer prevention and treatment, is that follow-up tobacco use data were not collected. The increasing evidence of the clinical impact of tobacco use on cancer prevention and prognosis across a range of disease sites warrants more widespread assessment in clinical trials than has typically been conducted (10, 29, 4447). Biochemical validation of smoking status was not conducted in P-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19] Tobacco assessment and cessation are also not addressed in cooperative group clinical trials supported by the National Institutes of Health. 20 In a recent large survey of thoracic oncology providers, 90% of respondents believed that tobacco cessation is an important part of cancer care, but most did not routinely provide cessation support. 21 The purpose of this study is to report patterns of tobacco use assessment and cessation support by ASCO members and to identify perceptions of tobacco use as well as barriers to implementing cessation support for patients with cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, many clinicians-including primary care providers, nurses, and oncologists-are reluctant to identify and address tobacco use by their patients [56,59,60]. Oftentimes, patient tobacco use status is not assessed in clinician encounters, and many clinicians do not refer patients to cessation programs.…”
Section: Tobacco Cessation Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the capacity for rapid research to assess the use and health effects of new tobacco products is needed, as well as providing more funding for research on lung cancer and tobacco cessation treatment.To better understand the impact of tobacco use and cessation on cancer treatment, all cancer clinical trials could include measures to assess tobacco use and cessation [59,89]. In addition, research could maximize the impact of FDA oversight by informing product standards and other regulations.…”
Section: Leveraging Research To Improve Tobacco Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%