To Whom God Speaks: Struggles for Authority through Religious Reflexivity and Performativity within a Gypsy Pentecostal Church

Abstract

By limiting Gypsy Travellers’ mobility, the state has restricted their subjectivities and their mobile lifestyles. In this context, Pentecostalism, an egalitarian doctrine based on the privatization of relations with God, creates new spaces for Gypsy Travellers’ self-expression, and further premises for their ethnic and cultural revivalism. Through a symbolic interactionist approach, this paper argues that Gypsy Travellers obtain individual authority through religious reflexivity and performativity. It examines ethnographically the inter- and intra-personal religious conversations among believers in a Gypsy Pentecostal church in Edinburgh, UK. It shows the ways in which Gypsy Travellers use internal dialogues with God and symbolic interactions with significant others in the church as means of self-expression. God is the relational conversational partner and facilitates the believer's self-mediation. It is the symbolic interface and signifier who can delegate authority to believers or preachers. Through the process of self-mastery, the practitioners of religious reflexivity gain control over themselves and perform authority in front of others. Thus, internal dialogues and symbolic interactions become the important experiential domains of a complex dramaturgy of Gypsy believers’ struggles for individual and collective authority.

Are Spiritual Experiences through Music Seen as Intrinsic or Extrinsic?

“…It confirms that this phenomenon is not a peripheral one, but a legitimate research area in need of further investigation. Our approach in this study has been quantitative, which places limitations on the conclusions drawn, but it builds on our earlier qualitative research to embrace different methodologies for better understanding the nature of spirituality and music (See, for example, [41]). In particular there is a need to investigate whether these results are applicable to non-religious people, or people of other religions.…”

Nomad self-governance and disaffected power versus semiological state apparatus of capture: The case of Roma Pentecostalism

“…However, during Pentecostal sermons, Roma believers are expected to actively and creatively participate in the new architecture of their subjectivities, practice the art of self-dialog through testimonies and prayers, deterritorialize existing domains of subjection to extraneous forms of power, and incorporate the self into a communion with the immanent Divine, which is appropriated as a life partner. Notwithstanding, and similar to Pentecostal Gypsy Travelers (Voiculescu, 2012), pastors are not recognized as community leaders exercising power over believers and are not followed as advisers on self-conduct. They are rather expected to enhance the believers' participation in the religious community (e.g.…”

“…As many Romanian Roma believers in Alexandri stated, the pastor's authority is limited to power to administratively build and organize a religious community and does not include the control over believers' everyday lives. This kind of community governance is commonly practiced in Romanian Roma Pentecostal unions all over Europe, including those established in the UK (Voiculescu, 2012;West of Scotland Regional Equality Council, 2015). Notwithstanding, these do not indicate an integration into a social and cultural space of the majority, as Slovak ethnologists Podolinska and Hrustic (2014) claim for the case of Slovak Roma.…”

“…Both suggest that Roma believers tend not to distinguish between divine authority (e.g. God or Jesus) and a dialogical religious self-self-God-and claim to be both masters of themselves and have God as the master of their private lives (Voiculescu, 2012). For believers, God appears as an egalitarian internal life partner and is therefore relational.…”

Lost Between Protective Regimes: Roma in the Norwegian State

“…Maria herself has only sporadically attended school, and she knew little about the laws and regulations that govern primary education. Many Roma regard formal schooling as an assimilatory strategy (Engebrigtsen 2007;Engebrigtsen and Lidén 2010;Voiculescu 2011) and evading school has been, and for some families still is, a way to resist assimilation.…”