2017
DOI: 10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.8.1016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To What Extent Can Constructed Wetlands Enhance Biodiversity?

Abstract: Abstract-We carried out a literature review to find evidence from empirical studies that constructed wetlands (CWs) can increase biodiversity at the site or landscape level. A set of criteria from general and theoretical ecology was developed that we found useful for defining 'best practice' in the construction of wetlands (e.g. landscape connectivity, area versus size, disturbance regime). Thereafter, we analyzed 21 original research papers where biodiversity development after wetland construction was documen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is often an assumption that nature based measures will be 'good for wildlife', and that ecosystem services features, such as SUDs waterbodies, agricultural bunded ditches and interception ponds will inevitably provide multi-functional benefits that include biodiversity gain (Burgess-Gamble et al, 2017). In practice, studies to test these assumptions have shown mixed results depending on the type of measures introduced and the biotic group used to derive metrics (Hansson et al, 2005;Thiere et al, 2009;Wiegleb et al, 2017). The results from our plant-based study provides some support for the value of ecosystem services waterbodies, particularly for reversing the impact of short term losses in catchment plant richness, and increasing the number of populations of some unique and replicate species.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Ecosystem Services Waterbodiesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…There is often an assumption that nature based measures will be 'good for wildlife', and that ecosystem services features, such as SUDs waterbodies, agricultural bunded ditches and interception ponds will inevitably provide multi-functional benefits that include biodiversity gain (Burgess-Gamble et al, 2017). In practice, studies to test these assumptions have shown mixed results depending on the type of measures introduced and the biotic group used to derive metrics (Hansson et al, 2005;Thiere et al, 2009;Wiegleb et al, 2017). The results from our plant-based study provides some support for the value of ecosystem services waterbodies, particularly for reversing the impact of short term losses in catchment plant richness, and increasing the number of populations of some unique and replicate species.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Ecosystem Services Waterbodiesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The value of long-term observation and comparative studies on the multiple ecological functions of CWs and natural wetlands cannot be underestimated, especially given that vegetation succession in CWs and the associated faunal turnover can be rapid. Indeed, the temporal dynamics of biological communities in CWs can have complicated implications for both pollutant removal and biodiversity conservation [153,154].…”
Section: Accurate Simulation Of Natural Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The portion of wetland plants was reduced over time, but~56% remained in 2013, demonstrating that the created wetland performed the function of habitats for wetland plants (Table 1). Under proper maintenance of water depth, created wetlands can greatly enhance biodiversity (Wiegleb et al 2017).…”
Section: Vegetation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%