2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To what extent are bryophytes efficient dispersers?

Abstract: Bryophytes are typically seen as extremely efficient dispersers. Experimental evidence suggests that efficient short‐distance dispersal coupled with random long‐distance dispersal (LDD) leads to an inverse isolation effect. Under the latter, a higher genetic diversity of colonizing propagules is expected with increasing isolation, counteracting differentiation beyond the range of short‐distance dispersal. This expectation is tested from a review of evidence on spatial genetic structure and analyses of isolatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spores contribute to long distance dispersal across landscapes (Patiño and Vanderpoorten, 2018). Bryophytes are thought to be efficient spore-dispersing organisms, with 100 kilometers suggested as a likely distance a spore could travel (Vanderpoorten et al, 2019). Bryophytes have relatively low rates of endemism compared to seed plants, and species composition patterns match more closely with wind connectivity patterns than geographic proximity (Patiño and Vanderpoorten, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spores contribute to long distance dispersal across landscapes (Patiño and Vanderpoorten, 2018). Bryophytes are thought to be efficient spore-dispersing organisms, with 100 kilometers suggested as a likely distance a spore could travel (Vanderpoorten et al, 2019). Bryophytes have relatively low rates of endemism compared to seed plants, and species composition patterns match more closely with wind connectivity patterns than geographic proximity (Patiño and Vanderpoorten, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this suggests that restrictions to gene flow in insular environments may be sufficient to elevate diversification rates to levels comparable to those observed at much larger continental scales, even in organisms with high long-distance dispersal capacities such as bryophytes. Mounting evidence from fine-scale population genetic studies in bryophytes reveals a significant partitioning of genetic variation among populations structured by short geographical distances (Vanderpoorten et al 2019). We thus propose that the minimum geographical distance required for neutral divergence, and hence speciation, might be much shorter than what bryophytes' capacity for occasional and random long-distance dispersal suggests.…”
Section: Speciation and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This was seen as evidence for in situ diversification within regions (mostly continents), which takes place at a faster rate than the intercontinental migration. The strong phylogeographic signal found in many bryophyte species at the intercontinental scale (Patiño & Vanderpoorten, 2018), along with the strong population genetic structuring observed in a number of continentally disjunct species Vanderpoorten & al., 2019), is in line with the notion that speciation has a spatial scale that depends on both area and levels of gene flow (Kisel & Barraclough, 2010). Our results suggest that in Epipterygium, large geographic areas seem to be required to allow speciation in allopatry.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%