2015
DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2015.1020146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To what end? Drip irrigation and the water–energy–food nexus in Morocco

Abstract: This article draws on three case studies of drip irrigation adoption in Morocco to consider the water -energy-food nexus concept from a bottom-up perspective. Findings indicate that small farmers' adoption of drip irrigation is conditional, that water and energy efficiency does not necessarily reduce overall consumption, and that adoption of drip irrigation (and policies supporting it) can create winners and losers. The article concludes that, although the water -energy-food WEF nexus concept may offer useful … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They describe the nexus approach as "conceptually inconclusive" and highlight the need for clarity on overarching objectives and guiding principles. In this vein, Jobbins et al (2015) come to the conclusion that nexus approaches are not per se pro-poor and ask: is "the reduction of trade-offs between water, energy and food security considered an end in itself, or does it support higher-level social goals such as the reduction of poverty?" For this paper we argue that the nexus can help to achieve better social and economic outcomes while reducing pressure on natural resources and the environment-so called "decoupling, " e.g., through enhancing resource use efficiencies across resources, through integrated management and governance and policy coherence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They describe the nexus approach as "conceptually inconclusive" and highlight the need for clarity on overarching objectives and guiding principles. In this vein, Jobbins et al (2015) come to the conclusion that nexus approaches are not per se pro-poor and ask: is "the reduction of trade-offs between water, energy and food security considered an end in itself, or does it support higher-level social goals such as the reduction of poverty?" For this paper we argue that the nexus can help to achieve better social and economic outcomes while reducing pressure on natural resources and the environment-so called "decoupling, " e.g., through enhancing resource use efficiencies across resources, through integrated management and governance and policy coherence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice was designed to highlight the possible differences between women, men and mixed organizations. At the same time, the level of education is an important variable influencing the access to the main internal management positions, the knowledge of the necessary bureaucratic procedures to achieve any financial support and the general degree of sustainability of horticultural and drip irrigation interventions [9], including better levels of food security and children protection. Another sphere in which most of the times women may be excluded is the provision of technical training and suitable extension services [34] actually designed to the specific requirements and limits of women active in agricultural contexts (e.g., lack of mobility, lower level of education, etc.…”
Section: The Water Gender Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it has great potential to enhance agricultural water efficiency, by which water saving irrigation is thus strongly encouraged [75]. For instance, drip irrigation is proposed by using networks of pipes to water the soil surface or root zone of plants directly, which is a management option to reduce water consumption and maintain agricultural production and productivity [76]. Compared with the conventional surface flooding irrigation commonly used in China, drip irrigation is more efficient in reduction of energy consumption and carbon emissions [77].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%