2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Transect or Not Transect: Results from the Scandinavian Urethroplasty Study, A Multicentre Randomised Study of Bulbar Urethroplasty Comparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis Versus Buccal Mucosal Grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, many of these “negative” studies have shown non-significant trends favoring non-transection, and the most recent and largest of these cohorts by Chapman et al, did find significantly more de novo ED in the transecting group at the 6 month mark (14.3% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.008) [ 18 ]. Further, a 2022 randomized control trial published by Nilsen et al, showed significant increased complaints of penile shortening and decreased glans fullness during erections, albeit with similar IIEF-5 scores between the groups at 3 months and 12 months [ 16 ]. This is consistent with prior retrospective data showing increased complaint of penile shortening associated with EPA [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, many of these “negative” studies have shown non-significant trends favoring non-transection, and the most recent and largest of these cohorts by Chapman et al, did find significantly more de novo ED in the transecting group at the 6 month mark (14.3% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.008) [ 18 ]. Further, a 2022 randomized control trial published by Nilsen et al, showed significant increased complaints of penile shortening and decreased glans fullness during erections, albeit with similar IIEF-5 scores between the groups at 3 months and 12 months [ 16 ]. This is consistent with prior retrospective data showing increased complaint of penile shortening associated with EPA [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not always well captured on existing patient reported outcomes, such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). A recent randomized trial addressed this gap by developing a novel outcome measure specific to urethroplasty with which they were able to detect significant differences in penile complications, including shortening and reduced glans filling, despite similar IIEF-5 scores between transecting and non-transecting groups ( Table 1 ) [ 16 ].…”
Section: Bulbar Urethroplasty: Transecting Vs Non-transecting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This debate focuses on the benefits of preserving the antegrade blood supply to the corpus spongiosum. A recent random- ized controlled trial comparing excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) and buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty found a higher rate of reduced glans filling in the EPA group [29].…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first multicenter RCT between two different bulbar urethroplasty techniques, Nilsen et al . [ 23 ] randomized (1:1) men with bulbar urethral stricture of < 2 cm to either transecting excision and primary anastomosis (tEPA) ( n = 75) or buccal mucosa grafting (BMG) ( n = 76). At a 12-month follow-up, the tEPA group reported more penile complications ( P = 0.02), especially reduced glans filling ( P = 0.03) and shortening of penis ( P = 0.001).…”
Section: Sexual Dysfunction and Penile Complication After Transecting...mentioning
confidence: 99%