Abstract:The geodesic has a fundamental role in physics and in mathematics: roughly speaking, it represents the curve that minimizes the arc length between two points on a manifold. We analyze a basic but misinterpreted difference between the Lagrangian that gives the arc length of a curve and the one that describes the motion of a free particle in curved space. Although they provide the same formal equations of motion, they are not equivalent. We explore this difference from a geometrical point of view, where we obser… Show more
“…The above equivalence of S 1 and S 2 could be demonstrated on a more complicated Lagrangian as a specific choice of parametrization such that g αβ (x) v α v β is constant [28]. Indeed, if one starts with the re-parametrization invariant Lagrangian L = qA α v α −m g αβ (x)v α v β and defines proper time gauge τ such that: dτ = g αβ dx α dx β ⇒ g αβ u α u β = 1, then one can effectively consider L = qA α u α − (m − χ) g αβ u α u β − χ as the model Lagrangian.…”
Section: B Equivalence Of Homogenous Lagrangiansmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since now S ′ 2 is reparametrization invariant then one can choose a gauge parametrization such that e = 1 and thus arriving at S 2 but under proper-time parametrization λ = τ where g αβ u α u β = 1. Having to choose the gauge such that g αβ v α v β is constant guarantees the equivalence of L 1 and L 2 [28].…”
Section: A Relativistic Particle Lagrangianmentioning
It is argued in favor of first-order homogeneous Lagrangians in the velocities. The relevant form of such Lagrangians is discussed and justified physically and geometrically. Such Lagrangian systems possess Reparametrization-Invariance (RI) and explain the observed common Arrow of Time as related to the nonnegative mass for physical particles. The extended Hamiltonian formulation, which is generally covariant and applicable to reparametrization-invariant systems, is emphasized. The connection between the explicit form of the extended Hamiltonian H and the meaning of the process parameter λ is illustrated. The corresponding extended Hamiltonian H defines the classical phase space-time of the system via the Hamiltonian constraint H = 0 and guarantees that the Classical Hamiltonian H corresponds to p0 -the energy of the particle when the coordinate time parametrization is chosen. The Schrödinger's equation and the principle of superposition of quantum states emerge naturally. A connection is demonstrated between the positivity of the energy E = cp0 > 0 and the normalizability of the wave function by using the extended Hamiltonian that is relevant for the proper-time parametrization.
“…The above equivalence of S 1 and S 2 could be demonstrated on a more complicated Lagrangian as a specific choice of parametrization such that g αβ (x) v α v β is constant [28]. Indeed, if one starts with the re-parametrization invariant Lagrangian L = qA α v α −m g αβ (x)v α v β and defines proper time gauge τ such that: dτ = g αβ dx α dx β ⇒ g αβ u α u β = 1, then one can effectively consider L = qA α u α − (m − χ) g αβ u α u β − χ as the model Lagrangian.…”
Section: B Equivalence Of Homogenous Lagrangiansmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since now S ′ 2 is reparametrization invariant then one can choose a gauge parametrization such that e = 1 and thus arriving at S 2 but under proper-time parametrization λ = τ where g αβ u α u β = 1. Having to choose the gauge such that g αβ v α v β is constant guarantees the equivalence of L 1 and L 2 [28].…”
Section: A Relativistic Particle Lagrangianmentioning
It is argued in favor of first-order homogeneous Lagrangians in the velocities. The relevant form of such Lagrangians is discussed and justified physically and geometrically. Such Lagrangian systems possess Reparametrization-Invariance (RI) and explain the observed common Arrow of Time as related to the nonnegative mass for physical particles. The extended Hamiltonian formulation, which is generally covariant and applicable to reparametrization-invariant systems, is emphasized. The connection between the explicit form of the extended Hamiltonian H and the meaning of the process parameter λ is illustrated. The corresponding extended Hamiltonian H defines the classical phase space-time of the system via the Hamiltonian constraint H = 0 and guarantees that the Classical Hamiltonian H corresponds to p0 -the energy of the particle when the coordinate time parametrization is chosen. The Schrödinger's equation and the principle of superposition of quantum states emerge naturally. A connection is demonstrated between the positivity of the energy E = cp0 > 0 and the normalizability of the wave function by using the extended Hamiltonian that is relevant for the proper-time parametrization.
“…3.74 it is used that the expression is a tensor density and contains the information on the local momentum p of the system, which allows it to be interpreted as the root of a Lagrangian density. This is again equivalent to the interpretation as Lagrangian density L if trajectories along constant flow velocity are considered (Rizzuti, Vasconcelos & Resende 2019).…”
Section: Equation Of Momentum Density and Interpretation As Lagrangia...mentioning
The gauge field equation for fluid mechanics established in Part I is developed into a first-order scattering theory in the simplified case of a two-dimensional incompressible flow over a flat plate. This is used to present a model for the origin of Tollmien-Schlichting (TS) waves based on scattering between fluid particles. As a result, analytical formulae for the maximum amplification factor and the transition point from laminar to turbulent flow in the boundary layer are obtained. The mathematical transformations from the stationary field equations in Part I to a scattering theory with time evolution along the flow axis using Wick rotation are elaborated in detail.
“…We point out that the action of the group of covariance acts in a slightly non-linear way upon the physical sector of the models. Standard examples of such models are the free relativistic particle [15] and the electrodynamics Lagrangian action [12].…”
Section: The 5-dimensional Lagrangian Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These quantities are not chosen randomly. We simply follow the same steps taken on the standard analysis of the free relativistic particle model [15], or, by the same token, the semiclassical spinning particle model [17], in order to remove the so discussed arbitrariness our model possesses. First of all, we point out that these quantities remain unaltered under the local symmetries,…”
In this paper we discuss how the Magueijo-Smolin Doubly Special Relativity proposal may obtained from a singular Lagrangian action. The deformed energy-momentum dispersion relation rises as a particular gauge, whose covariance imposes the non-linear Lorentz group action. Moreover, the additional invariant scale is present from the beginning as a coupling constant to a gauge auxiliary variable. The geometrical meaning of the gauge fixing procedure and its connection to the free relativistic particle are also described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.