2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To shred or not to shred: A comparative techno-economic assessment of lithium ion battery hydrometallurgical recycling retaining value and improving circularity in LIB supply chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The levelized cost of collecting and recycling NiMH battery is estimated to be about $3,500 and $2,900 per tonne for the conservative and optimistic scenarios, respectively. This range of cost compares fairly with estimates of hydrometallurgical LiB recycling costs in the literature, which range from $1,540-8,430 per tonne in an analysis by Thompson et al (2021) (lower end of the range corresponds to inorganic acids and higher end corresponds to organic acids as leaching agents), $3,730 per tonne in a study by Qiao et al (2019) on battery recycling in China, and $3,400 per tonne in a study by Xu et al (2020) based on Argonne National Laboratory's EverBatt model (Dai et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ll Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The levelized cost of collecting and recycling NiMH battery is estimated to be about $3,500 and $2,900 per tonne for the conservative and optimistic scenarios, respectively. This range of cost compares fairly with estimates of hydrometallurgical LiB recycling costs in the literature, which range from $1,540-8,430 per tonne in an analysis by Thompson et al (2021) (lower end of the range corresponds to inorganic acids and higher end corresponds to organic acids as leaching agents), $3,730 per tonne in a study by Qiao et al (2019) on battery recycling in China, and $3,400 per tonne in a study by Xu et al (2020) based on Argonne National Laboratory's EverBatt model (Dai et al, 2019).…”
Section: Ll Open Accesssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…[280] In this context, battery recycling is in constant competition with suppliers of virgin battery materials, both in terms of prices and material performance. [281,282] Several publications have indicated that better separation of material streams at the beginning of recycling can lead to higher product purity and recycling efficiency, contributing to a more competitive battery recycling industry. [281][282][283][284] Recently, Thompson et al evaluated the recycling costs for ten hydrometallurgical recycling processes from the literature and found that recycling based on shredded starting material offered cost savings of <20% for battery production compared to using virgin materials.…”
Section: Design For Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[281,282] Several publications have indicated that better separation of material streams at the beginning of recycling can lead to higher product purity and recycling efficiency, contributing to a more competitive battery recycling industry. [281][282][283][284] Recently, Thompson et al evaluated the recycling costs for ten hydrometallurgical recycling processes from the literature and found that recycling based on shredded starting material offered cost savings of <20% for battery production compared to using virgin materials. In comparison, recycling processes based on disassembled batteries as starting material showed cost savings of 40-80%, without considering additional disassembly costs.…”
Section: Design For Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the traditional shredding process, some researchers have proposed a more economical pretreatment process. Thompson et al [22] suggest disassembling spent LIBs and then layering them to retain product value and simplify downstream chemicals. The shredded material can be recycled into new cathode material with cost savings of up to 20%.…”
Section: Mechanical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%