1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1060-135x(96)90057-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To reuse or not reuse: Reuse of phacoemulsification needle tips, their efficacy, and patient response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many were editorials discussing sustainability. [44][45][46][47][48][49] Some explored sustainability-related topics without quantifying emissions, such as investigations of the cost and quality of reusable and single-use ophthalmic instruments 43,[50][51][52] or practices of recycling in eye care. [53][54][55] One study assessed the opinions of New Zealand Review ophthalmologists regarding sustainability.…”
Section: Other Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many were editorials discussing sustainability. [44][45][46][47][48][49] Some explored sustainability-related topics without quantifying emissions, such as investigations of the cost and quality of reusable and single-use ophthalmic instruments 43,[50][51][52] or practices of recycling in eye care. [53][54][55] One study assessed the opinions of New Zealand Review ophthalmologists regarding sustainability.…”
Section: Other Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 852 citations in the literature review, 13 articles describing 12 clinical studies met the selection criteria. There were five studies on coronary angioplasty catheters (1;19;21;22;24), three on devices used in laparoscopic surgery (3;6;9), two on sphincterotomes (13,23), and one each on external fixation devices for the management of fractures (7) and on phacoemulsification tips (18). There were two high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (3;24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%