To Rebuild or Relocate? Long-Term Mobility Decisions of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Recipients

Abstract

Limited funds and the demand for disaster assistance call for a broader understanding of how homeowners decide to either rebuild or relocate from their disaster-affected homes. This study examines the long-term mobility decisions of homeowners in Lumberton, North Carolina, USA, who received federal assistance from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) for property acquisition, elevation, or reconstruction following Hurricane Matthew in 2016. The authors situate homeowners’ decisions to rebuild or relocate in the context of property attributes and neighborhood characteristics. Logit and probit regressions reveal that homeowners with lower-value properties are less likely to relocate, and those subjected to higher flood and inundation risks are more likely to relocate. Additionally, homeowners in neighborhoods of higher social vulnerability—those with a higher proportion of minorities and mortgaged properties—are more likely to rebuild their disaster-affected homes. The authors discuss homeowners’ mobility decisions in the context of the social vulnerability of neighborhoods. Our results contribute to an ongoing policy discussion that seeks to articulate the housing and neighborhood attributes that affect the long-term mobility decisions of recipients of HMGP assistance. The authors suggest that local governments prioritize the mitigation of properties of homeowners of higher physical and social vulnerability to reduce socioeconomic disparities in hazard mitigation and build equitable community resilience.

Evaluating the effects of heat vulnerability on heat-related emergency medical service incidents: Lessons from Austin, Texas

“…Our research also advises that policymakers and practitioners devote resources and capacity building toward addressing inequality in these areas. Given that the allocation of financial resources for hazard reduction often favors particular communities (Seong et al, 2021(Seong et al, , 2022, our findings will support equitable heat mitigation initiatives.…”

Is a Smart City Framework the Key to Disaster Resilience? A Systematic Review

“…Given that, urban planners can envision highlighting the need to address the digital divide by designing a more advanced application layer with decision-specific algorithms for equitable outcomes. Building upon the findings of Seong, Losey, and Van Zandt (2021), and Seong, Losey, and Gu (2022), which reveal that resource allocation for hazard mitigation often disproportionately benefits specific communities due to unequal resource distribution in decision-making processes, disaster planners must adopt and incorporate smart city technologies to address efficiency, sustainability, and equity concerns in urban resilience. The smart disaster resilience framework must consider the social and economic ramifications of disasters, which disproportionately impact disadvantaged groups when viewed through the “lens of social vulnerability” (French, Feser, and Peacock 2008; Peacock et al 2014).…”

Interlinkages and gaps: a review of the literature on intergovernmental relations for flood management in the face of climate change

“…Climate change will continue to exacerbate conditions that increase the risk of illness and injury. Following hurricanes Katrina and Harvey, physical and mental health-related problems were welldocumented, particularly for children, the elderly, and lower income households (Ashley and Ashley, 2008;Qiang, 2019a;Seong et al, 2021;Mazumder et al, 2022). A community survey of respondents in Austin, Texas found that social vulnerability has a large, negative and statistically significant effect on risk perception (Bixler et al, 2021).…”