To Nap or Not to Nap? A Systematic Review Evaluating Napping Behavior in Athletes and the Impact on Various Measures of Athletic Performance

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to 1) determine how studies evaluated napping behavior in athletes (frequency, duration, timing and measurement); 2) explore how napping impacted physical performance, cognitive performance, perceptual measures (eg, fatigue, muscle soreness, sleepiness and alertness), psychological state and night-time sleep in athletes. Methods Five bibliographic databases were searched from database inception to 11 August 2020. Observational and experimental studies comprising able-bodied athletes (mean age ≥12 years), published in English, in peer-reviewed journal papers were included. The Downs and Black Quality Assessment Checklist was used for quality appraisal. Results Thirty-seven studies were identified of moderate quality. Most studies did not include consistent information regarding nap frequency, duration, and timing. Napping may be beneficial for a range of outcomes that benefit athletes (eg, physical and cognitive performance, perceptual measures, psychological state and night-time sleep). In addition, napping presents athletes with the opportunity to supplement their night-time sleep without compromising sleep quality. Conclusion Athletes may consider napping between 20 to 90 min in duration and between 13:00 and 16:00 hours. Finally, athletes should allow 30 min to reduce sleep inertia prior to training or competition to obtain better performance outcomes. Future studies should include comprehensive recordings of nap duration and quality, and consider using sleep over a 24 hour period (daytime naps and night-time sleep period), specifically using objective methods of sleep assessment (eg, polysomnography/actigraphy).

The Impact of a 14-Day Altitude Training Camp on Olympic-Level Open-Water Swimmers’ Sleep

“…Third, no inter-chronotype differences were investigated due to the small sample size of each sub-group. Fourth, athletes’ daytime napping behavior was not evaluated, and naps may represent a valid strategy for athletes to recover after nights of sleep restriction [ 37 ]. Fifth, pooling the sleep data of the four nights before the ATC (including the day of travel) introduced a potential confounding factor and, consequently, a real baseline sleep value was not obtained by the participants.…”

Barriers to high school and university students’ physical activity: A systematic review

“…The eligibility criteria were specified according to the Population, Exposure, Outcomes, and Study (PEOS) framework for the research question [ 63 – 65 ]: "P" referred to high school and/or university students, comprising adolescents or adults of both sexes aged between 10–30 years; "E" corresponded to barriers to physical activity; "O" constituted the practice of physical activity; and "S" referred to studies with qualitative and quantitative designs published during any year in peer-reviewed journals in English, Spanish, or Portuguese.…”

The Relationships of Sleep Duration and Inconsistency With the Athletic Performance of Collegiate Soft Tennis Players

“…However, the post hoc power analysis showed a statistical power of 63%. Fifth, diurnal naps are regarded as an advantageous intervention to enhance the recovery process and mitigate the negative effect of partial sleep deprivation on physical and cognitive performance ( Lastella et al, 2021 ; Souabni et al, 2021 ). In the present study, although nap records were found in several players’ sleep diaries, they were not habitual, so it was difficult for us to make further analyses on naps.…”