To meet grand challenges, agricultural scientists must engage in the politics of constructive collective action

Abstract

Agriculture now faces grand challenges, with crucial implications for the global future. These include the need to increase production of nutrient‐dense food, to improve agriculture's effects on soil, water, wildlife, and climate, and to enhance equity and justice in food and agricultural systems. We argue that certain politics of constructive collective action—and integral involvement of agricultural scientists in these politics—are essential for meeting grand challenges and other complex problems facing agriculture in the 21st century. To spur reflection and deliberation about the role of politics in the work of agricultural scientists, we outline these politics of constructive collective action. These serve to organize forceful responses to grand challenges through coordinated and cooperative action taken by multiple sectors of society. In essence, these politics entail (1) building bonds of affinity within a heterogenous network, (2) developing a shared roadmap for collective action, and (3) taking sustained action together. These emerging politics differ markedly from more commonly discussed forms of political activity by scientists, e.g., policy advisory, policy advocacy, and protest. We present key premises for our thesis, and then describe and discuss a politics of constructive collective action, the necessary roles of agricultural scientists, and an agenda for exploring and expanding their engagement in these politics.

Broadscale diversification of Midwestern agriculture requires an agroecological approach

“…In our view, it is crucial for academic agroecologists to intensify their participation in civil society arenas relevant to diversification. Moreover, this participation will require engagement in the politics of cross-sector collaboration (Jordan et al, 2020) and sustainability transitions. Such politics are required because broadscale diversification demands transformative change in the complex of factors that impede it.…”

Becoming agroecologists: A pedagogical model to support graduate student learning and practice

“…Relational politics is a framework for people to "interact on public matters in carefully designed processes in which participants use not only their minds and heads but also their bodies and emotions" (Levine, 2016). Dialogue and deliberation in relational politics builds mutual understanding, develops empathy and respect between people, and illuminates areas of alignment to recognize opportunities for collective action (Jordan et al, 2021). By the end of the seminar, the course participants began to imagine a holistic agroecology program at UMN-TC, building a draft pedagogy model that included the emergent themes from our collective learning-critical theory, relational politics, and participatory action research.…”

Adapting perennial grain and oilseed crops for climate resiliency

“…Another potential avenue will be carbon credits if perennials are a persistent part of the landscape (Englund et al., 2022). Currently the best example of a commercialized perennial grain is Kernza, which shows there can be marketplace complementation, adoption, and a price premium (Lanker et al., 2020; Jordan et al., 2021). Kernza was helped by concurrent market development and creation of distribution networks (Gutknecht et al., in review).…”