2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To loop or not to loop: what is the role of TADs in enhancer function and gene regulation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While experiments that perturb chromatin structure by deleting TAD borders have reported large (over 8-fold) changes in gene expression ( Cavalheiro et al, 2021 ; McCord et al, 2020 ; Figure 1—figure supplement 4 ), experiments that globally abrogated TADs by depleting cohesin observed few genes changing expression by more than 2-fold ( Rao et al, 2014 ; Zuin et al, 2014 ; Figure 5A, B ). As these experiments differ by orders of magnitude in the time scale at which transcription changes are assessed (due to technical limitations), we wanted to explore the temporal behavior of the futile cycle promoters by assessing the effect of a TAD boundary deletion/fusion at an early time point relative to a late time point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While experiments that perturb chromatin structure by deleting TAD borders have reported large (over 8-fold) changes in gene expression ( Cavalheiro et al, 2021 ; McCord et al, 2020 ; Figure 1—figure supplement 4 ), experiments that globally abrogated TADs by depleting cohesin observed few genes changing expression by more than 2-fold ( Rao et al, 2014 ; Zuin et al, 2014 ; Figure 5A, B ). As these experiments differ by orders of magnitude in the time scale at which transcription changes are assessed (due to technical limitations), we wanted to explore the temporal behavior of the futile cycle promoters by assessing the effect of a TAD boundary deletion/fusion at an early time point relative to a late time point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(C) Cartoon representation of the "lock and key" explanation of enhancer-promoter specificity, contrasted with the "tipping point" explanation suggested by results in (B). Hysteresis in promoter activation leads to a unique response at different timescales While experiments which perturb chromatin structure by deleting TAD borders have reported large (over 8-fold) changes in gene expression (Cavalheiro et al, 2021;McCord et al, 2020) ( Fig. 1 supplement 4), experiments which globally abrogated TADs by depleting cohesin observed few genes changing expression by more than two-fold (Rao et al, 2014;Zuin et al, 2014) (Fig.…”
Section: Promoter-specific Properties Can Create An Illusion Of Enhancer-promoter Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a large scale within nuclei, chromosomes segregate into regions of preferential long-range interactions that form two mutually excluded types of chromatin, referred to as “A” and “B” compartments [ 125 ], the formation of which has been recently linked to homotypic clustering of L1 and B1/Alu, respectively [ 126 ]. At a scale of tens to hundreds of kilobases, chromosomes fold into domains with preferential intradomain interactions known as topologically associating domains (TADs), which harbor the potential to influence enhancer function and thus gene regulatory networks [ 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 ]. TAD demarcation is achieved by specific regions called TAD boundaries, which are enriched for the occupancy of CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a zinc finger DNA binding protein also known to mediate the formation of chromatin loops [ 133 ].…”
Section: Retrotransposons and Their Impact On Mammalian Genome Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is also significant evidence questioning the role of the chromatin structure modulating gene expression [ 133 , 137 ]. In Drosophila , the analysis of gene expression in balancers (highly rearranged chromosomes) showed that disruption of TADs has little effect on gene activity and only a subset of genes is sensitive to structural alterations [ 138 ].…”
Section: Functional Organization Of the Genomementioning
confidence: 99%