2019
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To list or not to list: using time since invasion to refine impact assessment for an exotic plant proposed as noxious

Abstract: Methods that allow rapid and robust evaluation of plant invader impacts are needed to identify

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…66% to 54% at 11-to 48-year-old populations, respectively. Others have found either no difference in the density of invasive herbs (Hazelton et al 2015) or a slow gradual increase with time since invasion (Mitchell et al 2011;Ortega et al 2019). Thus, we do not see support for boom-bust dynamics in invasive herbs, although most data records, like ours, cover relatively short time spans.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…66% to 54% at 11-to 48-year-old populations, respectively. Others have found either no difference in the density of invasive herbs (Hazelton et al 2015) or a slow gradual increase with time since invasion (Mitchell et al 2011;Ortega et al 2019). Thus, we do not see support for boom-bust dynamics in invasive herbs, although most data records, like ours, cover relatively short time spans.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Time since invasion is rarely considered when investigating the impacts of invasive non-native species, although boom-bust dynamics is an established concept (e.g., Strayer et al 2017) and impacts of invasive non-native species can accumulate or change with time since local invasion (e.g., Gaertner et al 2009;Strayer 2012;Ortega et al 2019). Yet, in contrast to our expectations, lupine invasions revealed neither boom-bust dynamics of Lupinus polyphyllus, nor a change in its impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation