2011
DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2011.535732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To ITV or Not to ITV: A Comparison of Hybrid and Web-enhanced Approaches to Teaching a Macro-course in Human Behavior in the Social Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with prior correlational studies, as well as studies demonstrating a link between the amount of time logged into a required CMS and student grades in hybrid courses (DeNeui & Dodge, 2006;Forte & Root, 2011), MyPsychLab grades correlated with exam grades. This correlation suggests benefits of self-testing for learning (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In line with prior correlational studies, as well as studies demonstrating a link between the amount of time logged into a required CMS and student grades in hybrid courses (DeNeui & Dodge, 2006;Forte & Root, 2011), MyPsychLab grades correlated with exam grades. This correlation suggests benefits of self-testing for learning (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In their meta-analysis of 30 studies, Spanjers et al (2015) found that students slightly favoured blended formats with a small average effect size (g + = .11, p < .05). The body of evidence suggests that students often rank the blended delivery of the course significantly higher over its face-to-face or web-enhanced counterpart on satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, and their overall course expectations (Forte & Root, 2011;Kumrow, 2007;Vernadakis, Giannousi, Tsitskari, Antoniou, & Kioumourtzoglou, 2012). Lim, Morris, and Kupritz (2007) found that students were clearer on the method of learning in the blended course as it allows for opportunities to seek clarification about course requirements, though some studies (e.g., Larson & Sung, 2009) were inconclusive whether the course delivery methods influence student satisfaction.…”
Section: Student Satisfaction In Blended Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have indicated that technology is a point of concern in student satisfaction with SDE classroom settings. 10,[19][20][21][22] Both the quantitative analysis and qualitative responses in our study showed that the students in Cohort 2 were generally more satisfied with SDE than those in Cohort 1, correlating with distance education research that shows, if designed properly, distance classrooms can be successful in providing quality education, resulting in student satisfaction. 8,9,[21][22][23][24][25] The initial cohort of students and SDE instructors were novices to technologies used in the SDE classroom, which may have impacted student perceptions regarding satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We found no significant difference in these students' satisfaction with face-to-face SDE compared to their traditional classroom experiences, similar to the findings of other studies. 2,10,19 As technologies continue to evolve, more studies using face-to-face SDE need to be conducted using this specific form of face-to-face SDE. Limitations to this study included the following: 1) learning curve of faculty and students, on which some were more technologically experienced than others; 2) technical support from the institution, which has been found to influence student satisfaction; 3) experience and maturity of students, reflected in the demographics; and 4) effect of students on each other whether at the home site or the distance classroom.…”
Section: Table 3 Students' Perceptions Of This Synchronous Distance mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation