2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To Help or Not to Help? Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic

Abstract: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic fundamentally disrupted humans’ social life and behavior. Public health measures may have inadvertently impacted how people care for each other. This study investigated prosocial behavior, its association well-being, and predictors of prosocial behavior during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and sought to understand whether region-specific differences exist. Participants (N = 9,496) from eight regions clustering multiple countries around the world responded to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(79 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one could have reasonably expected that the implementation of social distancing measures could have led to diminished prosocial behaviors that require individual physical presence and potential health risk (Rochira et al, 2022). Indeed, Haller et al (2022) describe the frequency of self-reported prosocial activities during the first COVID-19 wave and observe that those that were less common are related to volunteering. Our analysis provides evidence based on administrative data showing that blood donation, a paradigmatic prosocial activity used in the economic literature as a leading proxy of social capital, has been fostered by the COVID-19 emergency in terms of quantity (i.e., number of new donors) and quality (i.e., their retention rate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one could have reasonably expected that the implementation of social distancing measures could have led to diminished prosocial behaviors that require individual physical presence and potential health risk (Rochira et al, 2022). Indeed, Haller et al (2022) describe the frequency of self-reported prosocial activities during the first COVID-19 wave and observe that those that were less common are related to volunteering. Our analysis provides evidence based on administrative data showing that blood donation, a paradigmatic prosocial activity used in the economic literature as a leading proxy of social capital, has been fostered by the COVID-19 emergency in terms of quantity (i.e., number of new donors) and quality (i.e., their retention rate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased impact of older age on the level of perceived health during the COVID-19 pandemic could be mediated by changed patterns of social connectedness between the pre-pandemic versus during-pandemic era. Prosocial behavior, which is predicted by higher levels of perceived social support, is also related to the better well-being [51,53]. Conversely, reduced mean number of social contacts compared to the pre-pandemic era has been maintained during the pandemic era from March 2020 to March 2021 [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one could have reasonably expected that the implementation of social distancing measures could have led to diminished prosocial behaviors that require individual physical presence and potential health risks (Rochira et al, 2022). Indeed, Haller et al (2022) describe the frequency of self-reported prosocial activities during the first COVID-19 wave and observe that those less common are related to volunteering. Our analysis provides evidence based on administrative data showing that blood donation, a paradigmatic prosocial activity used in the economic literature as a leading proxy of social capital, has been fostered by the COVID-19 emergency in terms of quantity (i.e., number of new donors) and quality (i.e., their retention rate).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%