‘To follow or not to follow?’: How Belgian health journalists use Twitter to monitor potential sources

Abstract

Digital technology, the internet and mobile media are transforming the journalism and media landscape by influencing the news gathering and sourcing process. The empowering capacities of social media applications may constitute a key element for more balanced news access and "inclusive journalism". We will build on two contrasting views that dominate the social media sourcing debate. On the one hand, literature shows that journalists of legacy media make use of social media sources to diversify their sourcing network including bottom-up sources such as ordinary citizens. On the other hand, various authors conclude that journalists stick with their old sourcing routines and continue to privilege top-down elite sources such as experts and government officials. In order to contribute to this academic debate we want to clarify the Twitter practices of professional Belgian health journalists in terms of how they use the platform to monitor potential sources. Therefore, we examined the 1146 Twitter "followings" of six Belgian health journalists by means of digital methods and social network analysis. Results show that top-down actors are overrepresented in the "following" networks and that Twitter's "following" function is not used to reach out to bottom-up actors. In the overall network, we found that the health journalists mainly use Twitter as a "press club" (Rupar, 2015) to monitor media actors. If we zoom in specifically on the "following" network of the healthrelated actors, we found that media actors are still important, but experts become the most followed group. Our findings also underwrite the "power law" or "long tail" distribution of social network sites as very few actors take a central position in the "following" lists while the large majority of actors are not systematically monitored by the journalists.

STANDER: An Expert-Annotated Dataset for News Stance Detection and Evidence Retrieval

“…For some of the mergers, we even observe a notable spike in the Twitter activity before, but close to the first merger's mention in the press (see the analysis of the ANTM CI merger in Appendix D). This is in line with studies on the usage of social media, especially Twitter, as sources of information for journalists (Van Leuven and Deprez, 2017;Rony et al, 2018;Johnson, 2019).…”

An Agenda-Setting Account for Psychological Typhoon Eye Effect on Responses to the Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan

“…Balancing agenda setting is easier to know than to do [36]. To do so, we must adhere to the correct reporting principle-what to be reported is neither completely irrelevant to nor completely related to major emergencies.…”

Networked agenda flow between elite U.S. newspapers and Twitter: A case study of the 2020 Black Lives Matter movement

“…This finding echoes the argument that traditional media, despite their declining influence, remain powerful enough to shape public discussions on social media, especially regarding political and cultural topics, such as social movements, elections, and political policies (Ceron et al, 2016; Groshek and Groshek, 2013; Harder et al, 2017). This is likely because journalists for elite newspapers have access to governmental officials, politicians, and lobbyists, and journalists usually “privilege top-down elite sources” (Van Leuven and Deprez, 2017: 545) and “rank them above many more traditional sources of information” (Cooper et al, 2007: 39). However, ordinary Twitter users do not have access to these resources.…”