2016
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2016.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To fly or not to fly: Factors influencing the flight capacity of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet interestingly, flightless Carabidae showed smaller positive changes in mixed forests and negative (i.e., opposite) changes in deciduous broadleaf forests. Newer populations of Carabidae are typically dominated by flight-capable species, whereas established populations include more flightless species (Venn, 2016). The superior dispersal ability of flight-capable Carabidae means that they are able to colonise new habitat and establish populations more successfully (Perry et al, 2020).…”
Section: Beetles Most At Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet interestingly, flightless Carabidae showed smaller positive changes in mixed forests and negative (i.e., opposite) changes in deciduous broadleaf forests. Newer populations of Carabidae are typically dominated by flight-capable species, whereas established populations include more flightless species (Venn, 2016). The superior dispersal ability of flight-capable Carabidae means that they are able to colonise new habitat and establish populations more successfully (Perry et al, 2020).…”
Section: Beetles Most At Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is reasonable to assume that all the sites have the same regional species pool. In addition, it must be noted that it is difficult to determine dispersal ability unambiguously for carabids because they show polymorphism in wing and wing muscle development from population to population (Venn 2016). Following Kohli et al (2018), we included four traits in our framework: traits associated with environmental filtering were species' preferences for sun exposure (forest, open land, generalist) and soil moisture (moist, dry, generalist), and traits associated with biotic interactions were species' trophic level (predator, herbivore, omnivore) and body size range (in mm).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some spiders like linyphiids are known to frequently use ballooning for dispersal (Oleszczuk and Karg, 2012), allowing them to disperse over large areas, whereas ground-dwelling carabids, although regularly still in possession of functioning wings, appear to move on the ground as their preferred mode of more limited and targeted dispersal (Venn, 2016). This, as well as differences in their feeding habits and associated diversity of hunting approaches, mean that spiders will likely react more strongly to the configuration of the wider landscape, as also indicated by Gardiner et al (2010), 92 whereas carabids will likely respond more strongly to factors at local scale than spiders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%