2015 2nd International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecs.2015.7124851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To detect malicious nodes in the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks using soft computing technique

Abstract: A Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a constantly self-configuring, infrastructure-less network of mobile devices where each device is wireless, moves without restraint and be a router to put across traffic unassociated to its own use. Every device must be prepared to constantly sustain the information obligatory for routing the traffic. And this is the main challenge in building a MANET. Such networks may be self operating or linked to a larger internet and may have one or multiple different transceivers betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this paper [14] suggested the fuzzy genetic algorithm that was used in [7,8] may have the higher rate of detection as compare to the decision tree algorithm in most cases, and it was good at detecting unknown attacks. It had a higher detection rate than the traditional genetic algorithm that was used in [6]. The genetic algorithm in [6] had a high detection rate for denial of service attacks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this paper [14] suggested the fuzzy genetic algorithm that was used in [7,8] may have the higher rate of detection as compare to the decision tree algorithm in most cases, and it was good at detecting unknown attacks. It had a higher detection rate than the traditional genetic algorithm that was used in [6]. The genetic algorithm in [6] had a high detection rate for denial of service attacks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It had a higher detection rate than the traditional genetic algorithm that was used in [6]. The genetic algorithm in [6] had a high detection rate for denial of service attacks. When compared with the winning entry of the KDD99 Classifier Learning Contest, it was shown to have a better detection rate for both denial of service and user to root attacks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%